Ethics of Intelligent Vehicles Technology: A Comprehensive Review



Autonomous driving, Ethics, Decision making system, Intelligent Vehicles, Mobility, sustainability, User and vehicles behavior system


Intelligent vehicles technology is growing with new developments and mobility systems. These developments arise so many implications in an ethical manner. Specifically in some scenarios i.e., vehicle uncontrolled situations by automation systems, program failure conditions in driving time, and many more. In this situation, who is responsible? The literature section explored the existing studies of who, how and when designed the ethics. The policy makers and standard organizations are designed some policies and recommended to the government which present following the policy system. These policies are only concerned about public health, environmental issues, road safety, traffic congestion and many more. But in few areas found implications i.e., data privacy, cyber security, cost and decision-making system etc. by existing studies. To improve this autonomous technology public fully acceptance is must. For the adoption of this technology, users get more benefits such as travel time, safety, mobility, no traffic, less environment issues etc. and at the same time some factors also influencing. Ethical and policy systems are linked to acceptance of this technology. Above ethics, policy and public acceptance of these technology areas are investigated and found to have some implication gaps. This paper aims to present the existing studies and implications in ethics, policy and public acceptance of this technology area. In future, this review study will recommend to all those doing research, engineers, philosophers, policy design government sections to develop the sustainability system in intelligent vehicles.


Download data is not yet available.


S. A. Bagloee, M. Tavana, M. Asadi, and T. Oliver, “Autonomous vehicles: challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies,” Journal of Modern Transportation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 284–303, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40534-016-0117-3.

Garg, K. . (2022). Beltrami’s Conjecture. International Journal on Recent Trends in Life Science and Mathematics, 9(2), 33–40.

T. Ebina and K. Kinjo, “Approaching the social dilemma of autonomous vehicles with a general social welfare function,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 104, p. 104390, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104390.

A. Etzioni and O. Etzioni, “AI assisted ethics,” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 149–156, May 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10676-016-9400-6.

J, M. S., S. K. Dr.N.C., M. Dr. P., T. N, and J. P. S. “IEEHR: Improved Energy Efficient Honeycomb Based Routing in MANET for Improving Network Performance and Longevity”. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, vol. 10, no. 7, July 2022, pp. 85-93, doi:10.17762/ijritcc.v10i7.5575.

N. De Moura, R. Chatila, K. Evans, S. Chauvier, and E. Dogan, “Ethical decision making for autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Xplore, Oct. 01, 2020. (accessed Mar. 30, 2022).

M. Cunneen, M. Mullins, F. Murphy, D. Shannon, I. Furxhi, and C. Ryan, “Autonomous Vehicles and Avoiding the Trolley (Dilemma): Vehicle Perception, Classification, and the Challenges of Framing Decision Ethics,” Cybernetics and Systems, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 59–80, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/01969722.2019.1660541.

L. T. Bergmann et al., “Autonomous Vehicles Require Socio-Political Acceptance—An Empirical and Philosophical Perspective on the Problem of Moral Decision Making,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 12, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00031.

Nouby M. Ghazaly, M. M. A. . (2022). A Review on Engine Fault Diagnosis through Vibration Analysis . International Journal on Recent Technologies in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, 9(2), 01–06.

W. Brenner and A. Herrmann, “An Overview of Technology, Benefits and Impact of Automated and Autonomous Driving on the Automotive Industry,” Digital Marketplaces Unleashed, pp. 427–442, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-49275-8_39.

J. Fleetwood, “Public Health, Ethics, and Autonomous Vehicles,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 532–537, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.2105/ajph.2016.303628.

André Sanches Fonseca Sobrinho. (2020). An Embedded Systems Remote Course. Journal of Online Engineering Education, 11(2), 01–07. Retrieved from

I. Barabás, A. Todoruţ, N. Cordoş, and A. Molea, “Current challenges in autonomous driving,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 252, p. 012096, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/252/1/012096.

A. K. Faulhaber et al., “Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 399–418, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0020-x.

G. Contissa, F. Lagioia, and G. Sartor, “The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law,” Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 365–378, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10506-017-9211-z.

A. Etzioni and O. Etzioni, “AI assisted ethics,” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 149–156, May 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10676-016-9400-6.

S. Burton, I. Habli, T. Lawton, J. McDermid, P. Morgan, and Z. Porter, “Mind the Gaps: Assuring the Safety of Autonomous Systems from an Engineering, Ethical, and Legal Perspective,” Artificial Intelligence, p. 103201, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2019.103201.

T. Fournier, "Will My Next Car Be a Libertarian or a Utilitarian? Who Will Decide?" in IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 40-45, June 2016, doi: 10.1109/MTS.2016.2554441.

Agarwal, D. A. . (2022). Advancing Privacy and Security of Internet of Things to Find Integrated Solutions. International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science &Amp; Communication Engineering, 8(2), 05–08.

T. J. M. Bench-Capon, “Ethical approaches and autonomous systems,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 281, p. 103239, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2020.103239.

Kose, O., & Oktay, T. (2022). Hexarotor Yaw Flight Control with SPSA, PID Algorithm and Morphing. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 10(2), 216–221. Retrieved from

Ethics Factors on Autonomous vehicles




How to Cite

S. . Karpurapu and N. V. . Raghuram J, “Ethics of Intelligent Vehicles Technology: A Comprehensive Review”, Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 281–284, Oct. 2022.



Research Article