A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Frameworks and Libraries
Keywords:
Deep learning frameworks, comparative analysis, performance evaluation, benchmark datasets, TensorFlowAbstract
Deep learning has become a popular approach for solving complex problems in various fields, including image recognition, natural language processing, and speech recognition. As a result, numerous deep learning frameworks and libraries have been developed, each with its unique strengths and weaknesses. Choosing the right framework and library for a given application is essential for achieving optimal performance and accuracy. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of deep learning frameworks and libraries based on their ease of use, computational efficiency, flexibility, and performance. The study evaluates six popular deep-learning frameworks and libraries, including TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch, Caffe, MXNet, and Theano. The evaluation process includes the implementation of deep learning models using each framework, training, and testing on benchmark datasets, and collecting evaluation metrics. The study uses several benchmark datasets, including CIFAR-10, ImageNet, and MNIST. The study compares the evaluated deep learning frameworks and libraries in terms of their ease of use, computational efficiency, flexibility, and performance. The study also discusses the impact of the evaluated deep learning frameworks and libraries on the performance and accuracy of the developed models, highlighting the trade-offs and limitations of each framework. The results show that TensorFlow and PyTorch are the most popular and widely used frameworks due to their flexibility, ease of use, and strong community support. This study has several implications for practitioners in the field of deep learning, highlighting the importance of the selection of the appropriate framework and library for the development of successful models. The study also contributes new insights and knowledge to the field of deep learning and suggests future research directions for improving and extending the research in new directions. Overall, this study provides valuable information for researchers and practitioners seeking to evaluate and select the best deep-learning framework and library for their specific needs.
Downloads
References
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., ... & Ghemawat, S. "TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems." arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467 (2016).
Chen, T., Li, M., Li, Y., Lin, M., Wang, N., Wang, M., ... & Zhang, Z. "MXNet: A flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems." arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.01274 (2015).
Chollet, F. "Keras." GitHub repository. https://github.com/fchollet/keras (2015).
Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., ... & Darrell, T. "Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding." In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia, pp. 675-678. ACM (2014).
Lee, D., Lee, S., Lee, S., Lee, J., & Lee, U. "Performance comparison of deep learning frameworks for object detection on NVIDIA Jetson Nano." Neural Computing and Applications, 33(8), 3887-3898 (2021).
Liu, X., Shi, Z., Han, B., & Chen, X. "A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Frameworks for Natural Language Processing." IEEE Access, 8, 41826-41837 (2020).
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Chintala, S., Chanan, G., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., ... & Lerer, A. "Automatic differentiation in PyTorch." In NIPS-W (2017).
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. "A survey on transfer learning." IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 22(10), 1345-1359 (2010).
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., ... & Berg, A. C. "ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge." International journal of computer vision, 115(3), 211-252 (2015).
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. "Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks." In European conference on computer vision, pp. 818-833. Springer (2014).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 M. Nagabhushana Rao
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.