Modelling Learner’s Perception of Blended Learning in a Developing Country
Keywords:
blended learning, theory of transactional distance, perception, collaboration, instructor involvement, nature of course, self-learning, internet experienceAbstract
The purpose of this research was to understand the factors (collaboration, instructor involvement, nature of course, self-learning and internet experience) that influence learner’s perception on blended learning. A total of 200 completed questionnaires were considered usable for this study. Structural equation modelling (SEM) using AMOS 23 was used to test the developed model. The findings show that all the five hypotheses were supported. Of the five predictors used in this study showed a positive effect on the perception of blended learning. The most influential predictor of Learner Perception was Collaboration followed by Instructor Involvement and Self-Learning which shows that the users of blended learning very much driven to use by the facilitation of Collaboration, Self-Learning and more Instructor Involvement in the course. In conclusion, this study is very beneficial to the education sector especially to those who are involved in learning and delivering blended courses. The findings in this study will definitely help the Ministry of Education and Higher Learning Institutions (HLIs) to gain better insight of the key factors that contribute to the perception on blended learning in order to gain competitive advantage in the learning hub.
Downloads
References
Albion, P. (2008). Virtual worlds: exploring potential for educational interaction. Paper presented at the EDMEDIA 2008: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vienna, Austria.
Bernard, R. M., Rubalcava, B. R., & St-Pierre, D. (2000). Collaborative online distance learning: Issues for future practices and research. Distance Education, 21(2), 260–277.
Bliuc, A.-M., Goodyear, P. and Ellis, R.A. (2007).Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231-244.
Blumberg, P. (2009). Maximizing learning through course alignment and experience with different types of Knowledge. Innovative Higher Education, 34(2), 93-103.
Buzzetto-More, N. (2008). Student Perceptions of Various E-Learning Components. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 4, 113-135.
Calvin, J. (2005). Explaining learner satisfaction with perceived knowledge gained in web-Based courses through course structure and learner autonomy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Ohio, USA.
Chen, Y., & Willits, F. (1998). A path analysis of the concepts in Moore's Theory of Transactional Distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. Journal of Distance Education, 13.
Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: CUP
Dillenbourg, P., Blaker, M., Blaye, A. and O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborating learning. In E. Spada and P.Reimand (Eds) Learning in humans and machine: towards an interdisciplinary learning science.Elsevier, Oxford, 189-211.
Gutierrez, J. J. (2000). Instructor-student interaction. USDLA Journal, 14(3).
He, K. H. (2004). View education technology development from blended learning. E-Education, 3, 1-6.
Huang, H. (2002). Students' perceptions in an online mediated environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29, 405-422.
Huang, H. (2002). Students' perceptions in an online mediated environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29, 405-422.
Kim, K.J., C.J. Bonk and E. Oh. (2008). The Present and Future State of Blended Learning in Workplace Learning Setting in The United States. Performance Improvement, 47(8), 5-16.
Koohang, A. (1989). A study of attitudes toward computers: Anxiety, confidence, liking, and perception of usefulness. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(2), 137-150.
Koohang, A., & Durante, A. (2003). Learners' perceptions toward the web-based distance learning activities/ assignments portion of an undergraduate hybrid instructional model. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 105.
Koohang, A., & Weiss, E. (2003). Effect of prior experience with the internet on graduate students' perception toward courseware usability & web-based distance learning instruction: An exploratory study in a hybrid instruction environment. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 4(2), 535.
Laanpere, M. (2005). Evaluation report of the online course: Design of online learning (Rep.). Turku, Finland: Center for Extension Studies, University of Turku.
Lee, S. & Tsai, C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of Internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 905-914.
Ling, S. E., Rahman, S., Ariffin, S. R., Leong, L. K., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2011). Perspectives on blended learning in Malaysian institute of higher education. World Applied Sciences Journal, 14(2), 51-57.
Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1-16.
Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025. (2015) (1st Ed.). Malaysia.
Matheos, K. M., Macdoland, M., McLean, C., Luterbach, B., Baidoun, S., & Nakashhian, S. (2007). A Comprehensive evaluation of Al-Quds Open University (Rep.). Al-Quds, Palestine: Al-Quds Open University
Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp.22-38). London: Routledge.
Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (2004). Distance education: A systems view (2nd Ed.). USA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.). Theoretical Principles of Distance Education. (pp. 22-38). London and New York: Routledge
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd Ed.). Canada: Thomson, Wadsworth
Muhammad Rais Abdul Karim & Yusup Hashim. (2004). The Experience of the ELearning Implementation at the Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 1(1), 50 - 59.
Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues of Interaction, Presence, and Performance in an Online Course, 6(1), 21-38
Poon, J. (2004). Effects of performance appraisal politics on job satisfaction and turnover intention. Personnel Review, 33(3), 322-334.
Raja Maznah Raja Hussin. (2004). E-Learning in Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Restauri, S. L., King, F. L., & Nelson, J. G. (2001). Assessment of students' ratings for two Methodologies of teaching via distance learning: An evaluative approach based on accreditation.
Roschelle, J. and Teasley, S.D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C.E. Malley (Ed) Computer supported collaboration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 69-97.
Saito, H., & Miwa, K. (2007). Construction of a learning environment supporting learners’ reflection: A case of information seeking on the Web. Computers & Education, 49, 214–229.
Schrum, L., and Hong, S. (2002). Dimensions and Strategies for Online Success: Voices from experienced educators. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1).
Sharma, P. (2010). Blended learning. ELT journal, 64(4), 456-458.
Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in Web-based Online Learning Environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2).
Shih, H. (2004). Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior. Information & Management, 41(6), 719-729.
Simonson M. R. (Ed.), Smaldino, S. E., & Zvacek, S. (2002). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (2nd Ed.). USA: Prentice-Hall.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2006). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance educationn (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: PEARSON.
Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: what the research tells us. In J. Bourne, & J. Moore (Eds.). Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction (pp. 13-45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education
Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: what the research tells us. In J. Bourne, & J. Moore (Eds.). Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction (pp. 13-45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education
Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: what the research tells us. In J. Bourne, & J. Moore (Eds.). Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction (pp. 13-45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education
Tsai, M.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43–50.
Walker, S. & Fraser, B. (2005). Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES). Learning Environ Res, 8(3), 289-308.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publication: Los Angeles.
Noor Hazlina Ahmad & T. Ramayah (2012). Does The Notion Of “Doing Well By Doing Good” Prevail Among Entrepreneurial Ventures In A Developing Nation? Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 479-490.
Kline, R. B. (2106). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press: New York.
Pasha, M. J. ., Sreenivasulu, K. ., Ramani, B. R. ., Sunitha, M. J. ., Swetha, K., & Samunnisa, K. . (2023). Solid Waste Supervision System based on Heuristic Algorithmic approach and Internet of Things . International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(1s), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i1s.6000
Mr. Ather Parvez Abdul Khalil. (2012). Healthcare System through Wireless Body Area Networks (WBAN) using Telosb Motes. International Journal of New Practices in Management and Engineering, 1(02), 01 - 07. Retrieved from http://ijnpme.org/index.php/IJNPME/article/view/4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
