Enhanced Short-term System Marginal Price (SMP) Forecast Modelling Using a Hybrid Model Combining Least Squares Support Vector Machines and the Genetic Algorithm in Peninsula Malaysia

Authors

  • Intan Azmira Wan Abdul Razak Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Hang Tuah Jaya, Durian Tunggal, Melaka - 76100, Malaysia
  • Wan Syakirah Wan Abdullah Business Assessment & Engineering 2, TNB Renewables Sdn. Bhd., Jalan Bukit Pantai, Bangsar - 59100, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Fani Sulaima Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Hang Tuah Jaya, Durian Tunggal, Melaka - 76100, Malaysia

Keywords:

Electricity price forecasting, Genetic algorithm, Least squares support vector machine, System Marginal Price (SMP)

Abstract

Forecasting SMP is critical in power systems, allowing market participants and grid operators to make more informed decisions. SMP prediction faces nonlinearities, volatility, and intricate factor interactions. Meanwhile, several existing methodologies exhibit inaccuracies in their predictions. Furthermore, when used across multiple circumstances, single forecasting algorithms have lower accuracy.  This paper presents a novel forecasting model that combines Least Squares Support Vector Machines (LSSVM) and the Genetic Algorithm (GA) for (i) parameter optimization, and (ii) parameter optimization and input selection, for accurate SMP prediction. Furthermore, the performance of LSSVM-GA was observed through daily and weekly forecasts. GA optimizes the LSSVM parameters and forecast inputs concurrently to ensure the best possible performance. Historical data from the Single Buyer (SB) has been employed to train and evaluate this model. Correlation Analysis aids feature selection, boosting model generalization. Multiple forecast input combinations were examined to identify the most important forecasting features. The proposed daily forecast model exhibited a 3.54% performance improvement compared to the SB daily forecast model. Likewise, the proposed weekly forecast model outperformed the Single Buyer (SB) forecast by 1.19%. As per the results, the hybrid algorithm shows great potential as a viable option for generating precise forecasts of electricity prices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Narajewski and F. Ziel, “Ensemble forecasting for intraday electricity prices: Simulating trajectories,” Appl. Energy, vol. 279, no. April, p. 115801, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115801.

T. Jónsson, P. Pinson, H. Madsen, and H. A. Nielsen, “Predictive densities for day-ahead electricity prices using time-adaptive quantile regression,” Energies, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 5523–5547, 2014, doi: 10.3390/en7095523.

F. J. Nogales and a J. Conejo, “Electricity price forecasting through transfer function models,” J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 350–356, 2006, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601995.

J. Lagarto, J. De Sousa, Á. Martins, and P. Ferrão, “Price forecasting in the day-ahead Iberian electricity market using a conjectural variations ARIMA model,” in 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market, EEM 12, 2012, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/EEM.2012.6254734.

M. Zhou, Z. Yan, Y. X. Ni, G. Li, and Y. Nie, “Electricity price forecasting with confidence-interval estimation through an extended ARIMA approach,” in IEE Proceedings - Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2006, vol. 153, no. 2, p. 187, doi: 10.1049/ip-gtd:20045131.

J. Contreras, R. Espinola, F. J. Nogales, and a. J. Conejo, “ARIMA models to predict next-day electricity prices,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1014–1020, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.804943.

T. Jakasa, I. Androcec, and P. Sprcic, “Electricity price forecasting - ARIMA model approach,” in 2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), 2011, no. May, pp. 222–225, doi: 10.1109/EEM.2011.5953012.

H. Liu and J. Shi, “Applying ARMA–GARCH approaches to forecasting short-term electricity prices,” Energy Econ., vol. 37, pp. 152–166, May 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.006.

A. R. Khan, A. Mahmood, A. Safdar, Z. A. Khan, and N. A. Khan, “Load forecasting, dynamic pricing and DSM in smart grid: A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 54, pp. 1311–1322, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.117.

A. B. İpek, “Analysis of System Marginal Price in the Turkish Electricity Market,” in Considerations of Territorial Planning, Space, and Economic Activity in the Global Economy, 2023, pp. 225–240.

C. Zhang, R. Li, H. Shi, and F. Li, “Deep learning for day‐ahead electricity price forecasting,” IET Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 462–469, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1049/iet-stg.2019.0258.

G. Marcjasz, “Forecasting electricity prices using deep neural networks: A robust hyper-parameter selection scheme,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13184605.

W. Li and D. M. Becker, “Day-ahead electricity price prediction applying hybrid models of LSTM-based deep learning methods and feature selection algorithms under consideration of market coupling,” Energy, vol. 237, p. 121543, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121543.

R. Zhang, G. Li, and Z. Ma, “A Deep Learning Based Hybrid Framework for Day-Ahead Electricity Price Forecasting,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 143423–143436, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014241.

A. Brusaferri, M. Matteucci, P. Portolani, and A. Vitali, “Bayesian deep learning based method for probabilistic forecast of day-ahead electricity prices,” Appl. Energy, vol. 250, no. May, pp. 1158–1175, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.068.

J. Noh and H. C. Cho, “Forecasting System Marginal Price Using Multilayer Perceptron and Nonlinear Autoregressive exogenous model,” J. Korean Soc. Miner. Energy Resour. Eng., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 585–592, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.32390/ksmer.2020.57.6.585.

G. Memarzadeh and F. Keynia, “Short-term electricity load and price forecasting by a new optimal LSTM-NN based prediction algorithm,” cc, vol. 192, no. July 2020, p. 106995, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106995.

M. F. Azam and M. S. Younis, “Multi-Horizon Electricity Load and Price Forecasting Using an Interpretable Multi-Head Self-Attention and EEMD-Based Framework,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 85918–85932, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3086039.

[19] A. Heydari, M. Majidi Nezhad, E. Pirshayan, D. Astiaso Garcia, F. Keynia, and L. De Santoli, “Short-term electricity price and load forecasting in isolated power grids based on composite neural network and gravitational search optimization algorithm,” Appl. Energy, vol. 277, no. January, p. 115503, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115503.

C. Lee and C. Wu, “Short-Term Electricity Price Forecasting Based on Similar Day-Based Neural Network,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 4408, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13174408.

F. H. Jufri, S. Oh, and J. Jung, “Day-Ahead System Marginal Price Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Network and Similar-Days Information,” J. Electr. Eng. Technol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 561–568, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s42835-018-00058-w.

M. Halužan, M. Verbič, and J. Zorić, “Performance of alternative electricity price forecasting methods: Findings from the Greek and Hungarian power exchanges,” Appl. Energy, vol. 277, no. April, p. 115599, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115599.

A. Ghasemi-Marzbali, “A developed short-term electricity price and load forecasting method based on data processing, support vector machine, and virus colony search,” Energy Effic., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1525–1542, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12053-020-09898-w.

H. Wang and D. Hu, “Comparison of SVM and LS-SVM for Regression,” in 2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain, 2005, no. 5, pp. 279–283.

G. Xie, S. Wang, Y. Zhao, and K. K. Lai, “Hybrid approaches based on LSSVR model for container throughput forecasting: A comparative study,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2232–2241, May 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2013.02.002.

S. Li and L. Dai, “Classification of gasoline brand and origin by Raman spectroscopy and a novel R-weighted LSSVM algorithm,” Fuel, vol. 96, pp. 146–152, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.001.

J. H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. 1975.

E. Elbeltagi, T. Hegazy, and D. Grierson, “Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms,” Adv. Eng. Informatics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 43–53, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2005.01.004.

D. Zhijie, Li; Xiangdong, Comparative Research on Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic AlgorithmLiu; Xiangdon, “Comparative Research on Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization and Hybrid GA-PSO,” in Computer and Information Science, 2010, vol. 3, pp. 120–127.

Kumar M, G. ., & Goswami, A. D. . (2023). Deep Convolutional Neural Network Classifier for Effective Knee Osteoarthritis Classification . International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i3.6343

Sarangi, D. P. K. . (2022). Malicious Attacks Detection Using Trust Node Centric Weight Management Algorithm in Vehicular Platoon. Research Journal of Computer Systems and Engineering, 3(1), 56–61. Retrieved from https://technicaljournals.org/RJCSE/index.php/journal/article/view/42

Downloads

Published

21.09.2023

How to Cite

Abdul Razak, I. A. W. ., Abdullah, W. S. W. ., & Sulaima, M. F. . (2023). Enhanced Short-term System Marginal Price (SMP) Forecast Modelling Using a Hybrid Model Combining Least Squares Support Vector Machines and the Genetic Algorithm in Peninsula Malaysia. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(4), 289–298. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/3525

Issue

Section

Research Article