Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Hybrid CNN-GRU Model for Prediction of Earthquake for Disaster Management

Authors

  • Raksha Puthran Assistant Professor Gd-II, Department of Master of Computer Application, NMAMIT Nitte(Deemed to be university), Nitte

Keywords:

Earthquake, Prediction, ; Convolutional Neural Network, Gated Recurrent Unit, Seismic data

Abstract

Earthquake prediction holds immense significance for disaster management and public safety. This study presents a novel approach for earthquake prediction through spatio-temporal analysis using a Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) model. The methodology integrates the strengths of CNNs in spatial feature extraction and GRUs in temporal pattern recognition, offering a comprehensive understanding of seismic events. The research incorporates seismic data enriched with geographical parameters, facilitating the analysis of earthquake occurrences across diverse regions. The model's spatial component, CNN, excels in capturing intricate spatial features within seismic data. In parallel, the temporal component, GRU, effectively discerns evolving patterns of seismic activity over time. This hybrid architecture ensures a holistic analysis of seismic data, enabling early detection and accurate earthquake prediction. To evaluate the model's efficacy, extensive experiments are conducted using seismic data from various regions. Performance metrics such as mean absolute error, mean squared error, and root-mean-square error are employed to assess predictive accuracy. Comparative analysis demonstrates the superiority of the Hybrid CNN-GRU model in earthquake prediction, particularly for large seismic events. The proposed methodology offers valuable insights for enhancing earthquake prediction systems, contributing to disaster management strategies and bolstering public safety measures. This research represents a significant advancement in the field of seismology, providing a robust framework for mitigating the impact of earthquakes on communities worldwide. In our seismic prediction study, we achieved remarkable results with our hybrid CNN-GRU model, attaining a high accuracy rate of 98.67%. The proposed model exhibited a significantly low loss, indicating its proficiency in capturing intricate spatial-temporal patterns within seismic data. These findings underscore the model's potential for enhancing earthquake forecasting accuracy, making it a valuable contribution to early warning systems and seismic research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Y. Tim, S. L. Pan, P. Ractham, and L. Kaewkitipong, “Digitally enabled disaster response: the emergence of social media as boundary objects in a flooding disaster: Social media for disaster response,” Info Systems J, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 197–232, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1111/isj.12114.

S. M. Taohidul Islam and Z. Chik, “Disaster in Bangladesh and management with advanced information system,” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 521–530, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1108/09653561111178952.

K. M. Gebbie and K. Qureshi, “Emergency and Disaster Preparedness: Core Competencies for Nurses: What every nurse should but may not know.,” American Journal of Nursing, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 46–51, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1097/00000446-200201000-00023.

P. Chittora et al., “Experimental analysis of earthquake prediction using machine learning classifiers, curve fitting, and neural modeling,” In Review, preprint, Sep. 2022. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1896823/v2.

M. Sakurai and Y. Murayama, “Information technologies and disaster management – Benefits and issues -,” Progress in Disaster Science, vol. 2, p. 100012, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100012.

B. Li, A. Gong, T. Zeng, W. Bao, C. Xu, and Z. Huang, “A Zoning Earthquake Casualty Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning,” Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 30, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/rs14010030.

T. Perol, M. Gharbi, and M. Denolle, “Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location,” Sci. Adv., vol. 4, no. 2, p. e1700578, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700578.

L. Laurenti, E. Tinti, F. Galasso, L. Franco, and C. Marone, “Deep learning for laboratory earthquake prediction and autoregressive forecasting of fault zone stress,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol. 598, p. 117825, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117825.

R. Jena, B. Pradhan, A. Al-Amri, C. W. Lee, and H. Park, “Earthquake Probability Assessment for the Indian Subcontinent Using Deep Learning,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 16, p. 4369, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20164369.

S. M. Mousavi, W. L. Ellsworth, W. Zhu, L. Y. Chuang, and G. C. Beroza, “Earthquake transformer—an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking,” Nat Commun, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 3952, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w.

V. Linardos, M. Drakaki, P. Tzionas, and Y. Karnavas, “Machine Learning in Disaster Management: Recent Developments in Methods and Applications,” MAKE, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 446–473, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/make4020020.

B. Rouet-Leduc, C. Hulbert, N. Lubbers, K. Barros, C. J. Humphreys, and P. A. Johnson, “Machine Learning Predicts Laboratory Earthquakes: MACHINE LEARNING PREDICTS LAB QUAKES,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 44, no. 18, pp. 9276–9282, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1002/2017GL074677.

R. Mallouhy, C. A. Jaoude, C. Guyeux, and A. Makhoul, “Major earthquake event prediction using various machine learning algorithms,” in 2019 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Disaster Management (ICT-DM), Paris, France: IEEE, Dec. 2019, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/ICT-DM47966.2019.9032983.

“Earthquake Prediction Based on Spatio-Temporal Data Mining.pdf,” Google Docs. Accessed: Sep. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13mmOrZn1p9qDq4egHCIPhUlk9jbC-QfF/view?usp=embed_facebook

A. Berhich, F.-Z. Belouadha, and M. I. Kabbaj, “A location-dependent earthquake prediction using recurrent neural network algorithms,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 161, p. 107389, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107389.

M. A. Bilal, Y. Wang, Y. Ji, M. P. Akhter, and H. Liu, “Earthquake Detection Using Stacked Normalized Recurrent Neural Network (SNRNN),” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 14, p. 8121, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13148121.

P. Xiong et al., “Towards advancing the earthquake forecasting by machine learning of satellite data,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 771, p. 145256, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145256.

J. Jia and W. Ye, “Deep Learning for Earthquake Disaster Assessment: Objects, Data, Models, Stages, Challenges, and Opportunities,” Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 16, p. 4098, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/rs15164098.

P. Kavianpour, M. Kavianpour, E. Jahani, and A. Ramezani, “A CNN-BiLSTM Model with Attention Mechanism for Earthquake Prediction.” arXiv, Dec. 26, 2021. Accessed: Sep. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13444

“NNW.2018.28.009.pdf.” Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://nnw.cz/doi/2018/NNW.2018.28.009.pdf

“historical dataset earth quake - ngdc.noaa.gov Search Results.” Accessed: Sep. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://search.usa.gov/search?affiliate=ngdc.noaa.gov&v%3Aproject=firstgov&query=historical+dataset+earth+quake&x=0&y=0

P. Kavianpour, M. Kavianpour, E. Jahani, and A. Ramezani, “A CNN-BiLSTM Model with Attention Mechanism for Earthquake Prediction.” arXiv, Dec. 26, 2021. Accessed: Sep. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13444

K. M. Asim, A. Idris, T. Iqbal, and F. Martínez-Álvarez, “Earthquake prediction model using support vector regressor and hybrid neural networks,” PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 7, p. e0199004, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199004.

Shanthi, D. N. ., & J, S. . (2022). Social Network Based Privacy Data Optimization Using Ensemble Deep Learning Architectures. Research Journal of Computer Systems and Engineering, 3(1), 62–66. Retrieved from https://technicaljournals.org/RJCSE/index.php/journal/article/view/43

Manikandan, J. ., & Uppalapati, S. L. . (2023). Critical Analysis on Detection and Mitigation of Security Vulnerabilities in Virtualization Data Centers. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(3s), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i3s.6187

Downloads

Published

04.11.2023

How to Cite

Puthran, R. . (2023). Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Hybrid CNN-GRU Model for Prediction of Earthquake for Disaster Management. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(3s), 270–281. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/3705

Issue

Section

Research Article

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.