Innovative Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Probing Aphasic Functional Connectivity in fMRI Data

Authors

  • Kailash Nath Tripathi Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam Technical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India
  • Sudhakar Tripathi Department of Information Technology, R. E. C. Ambedkar Nagar, U. P., India
  • Ravi Bhushan Mishra Department of Computer Science & Engineering, IIT(BHU)(Retd.), Varanasi, U. P., India

Keywords:

Neuroscience, Brain connectivity, Language Processing, GCNN Paradigm, fMRI data analysis

Abstract

In neuroscience, exploring the role of brain connectivity in language processing was fundamentally important. Recent developments in feature extraction, the insights offered by transformer-based language models, and comprehensive approaches to studying acute ischemic stroke underscored the urgency for groundbreaking research methods. Addressing this need, our study introduced the Innovative Graph Convolutional Neural Network (GCNN) Paradigm. This novel approach was adept at examining aphasic functional connectivity, utilizing the capabilities of advanced Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data analysis. This research adopted an all-encompassing strategy. It leveraged a varied group of participants and state-of-the-art imaging technology, notably the Siemens Prisma 3 Tesla MRI scanner. Our methodology was meticulous, involving detailed data collection, a comprehensive preprocessing routine, and the deployment of our groundbreaking GCNN framework. We adhered to a training, validation, and testing division of 70-15-15%. The evaluation of the model was thorough, employing metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, and was further strengthened by a 5-fold cross-validation approach. Our findings indicated significant changes in brain connectivity associated with aphasia. The GCNN model excelled in both performance and clinical relevance, marking a substantial step forward in our understanding of how neural networks facilitate language processing. The precision of the GCNN Paradigm not only enhanced our grasp of these neural networks but also set new precedents for meticulousness and ethical standards in scientific research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mohanty, R. (2019). Rethinking Measures of Brain Connectivity Via Feature Extraction. The University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Kumar, S., Sumers, T. R., Yamakoshi, T., Goldstein, A., Hasson, U., Norman, K. A., ... & Nastase, S. A. (2022). Reconstructing the cascade of language processing in the brain using the internal computations of a transformer-based language model. BioRxiv, 202206.

Saceleanu, V. M., Toader, C., Ples, H., CovacheBusuioc, R. A., Costin, H. P., Bratu, B. G., ... & Ciurea, A. V. (2023). Integrative Approaches in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Symptom Recognition to Future Innovations. Biomedicines, 11(10), 2617.

Novick, J. M., Kan, I. P., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson Schill, S. L. (2009). A case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive neuropsychology, 26(6), 527567.

Holm, L., & Billing, E. (2019). Proceedings of the 15th SweCog Conference. In SweCog 2019, the 15th SweCog conference, Umeå, Sweden, November 78, 2019. University of Skövde.

Holm, L., & Billing, E. (2019). Umeå 2019.

GonzalezLopez, J. A., GomezAlanis, A., Doñas, J. M. M., PérezCórdoba, J. L., & Gomez, A. M. (2020). Silent speech interfaces for speech restoration: A review. IEEE access, 8, 177995178021.

CENTER, H. I. (2020). THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE BCI: SCIENCE AND PRACTICE. SAMARA 2020.

Bollmann, Y. (2019). Emergence of functional and structural cortical connectomes through the developmental prism (Doctoral dissertation, AixMarseille).

Perron, J., & Ko, J. H. (2022). Review of Quantitative Methods for the Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease with Positron Emission Tomography. Applied Sciences, 12(22), 11463.

Arora, J. (2023). Deciphering Beyond the View: A Brain Decoding Approach to Language Processing Tasks (Doctoral dissertation, International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad).

Deligani, R. J., Borgheai, S. B., McLinden, J., & Shahriari, Y. (2021). Multimodal fusion of EEGfNIRS: a mutual informationbased hybrid classification framework. Biomedical Optics Express, 12(3), 16351650.

Trippa, M. (2019). Associative Transitions in Language Processing.

Fang, G., Liu, M., Zhong, Y., Zhang, Z., Huang, J., Tang, Z., & Chen, C. Y. C. (2023). Multimodal Identification of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12842.

Schaller, B. (Ed.). (2007). Stateoftheart Imaging in Stroke (Vol. 2). Nova Publishers.

Tovino, S. A. (2006). The visible brain: Confidentiality and privacy implications of functional magnetic resonance imaging. The University of Texas Medical Branch Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences.

Chen, Z., Duan, S., & Peng, Y. (2022). EEGBased Emotion Recognition by Retargeted SemiSupervised Regression with Robust Weights. Systems, 10(6), 236.

Titz, I. (2022). Technologically Enhancing Our Moral Identity. C Ponference ROGRAMME, 44.

Rouzitalab, A. (2023). Decoding Intentions from MicroElectrode Recordings of Neuronal Ensembles in Primates (Doctoral dissertation, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa).

Schwartz, B. L. (2020). Memory: Foundations and applications. Sage Publications.

GHTS, T. C. P. S., & ERSTO, O. M. N. R. T he me 1: C LI NI CALT RI ALS: METHODOLOGY.

Wegemer, C. (2019). Braincomputer interfaces and education: the state of technology and imperatives for the future. International Journal of Learning Technology, 14(2), 141161.

D’Onofrio, V., Manzo, N., Guerra, A., Landi, A., Baro, V., Määttä, S., ... & Ferreri, F. (2023). Combining Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Deep Brain Stimulation: Current Knowledge, Relevance and Future Perspectives. Brain Sciences, 13(2), 349.

Poel, M., Mühl, C., Reuderink, B., & Nijholt, A. (2010). Guessing what's on your mind.

Gorgolewski KJ, Storkey A, Bastin ME, Whittle IR, Wardlaw JM, Pernet CR. A test-retest fMRI dataset for motor, language and spatial attention functions. Gigascience. 2013 Apr 29;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-2-6. PMID: 23628139; PMCID: PMC3641991.

Makayla Gibson and Roger Newman-Norlund and Leonardo Bonilha and Julius Fridriksson and Gregory Hickok and Argye E. Hillis and Dirk-Bart den Ouden and Chris Rorden (2023). Aphasia Recovery Cohort (ARC) Dataset. OpenNeuro. [Dataset] doi: doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds004884.v1.0.1

Friston, K. J., Williams, S., Howard, R., Frackowiak, R. S. J and Turner, R. (1996) Movement-Related Effects in fMRI Time-Series. Magn. Reson. Med. 35,346-355.

Evans, A. C., Collins, D. L., Mills, S. R., Brown, E. D., Kelly, R. L., & Peters, T. M. (1993). 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. In 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

Ashby, F. G. (2011). Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data. MIT Press.

Behzadi, Y., Restom, K., Liau, J., & Liu, T. T. (2007). A component-based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion-based fMRI. NeuroImage, 37(1), 90-101.

Gama, F., Marques, A.G., Leus, G., & Ribeiro, A. (2018). Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Signals Supported on Graphs. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 67, 1034-1049.

de Herrera, Alba García Seco et al. “Graph representation for content-based fMRI activation map retrieval.” 2017 IEEE Life Sciences Conference (LSC) (2017): 129-132.

Zhou, Yuchen et al. “A deep graph convolutional neural network architecture for graph classification.” PLOS ONE 18 (2023)

Li, Guohao et al. “Training Graph Neural Networks with 1000 Layers.” ArXiv abs/2106.07476 (2021)

Wu, Junwei et al. “Performance Analysis of Graph Neural Network Frameworks.” 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS) (2021): 118-127.

Shi, Chengzhi et al. “Statistical Mechanics of Generalization In Graph Convolution Networks.” ArXiv abs/2212.13069 (2022)

Downloads

Published

23.02.2024

How to Cite

Tripathi, K. N. ., Tripathi, S. ., & Mishra, R. B. . (2024). Innovative Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Probing Aphasic Functional Connectivity in fMRI Data. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(17s), 353–362. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/4881

Issue

Section

Research Article