Utilizing Multiagent-Based Conceptual Learning in STEM Education for Analytical Learners through a Random Classifier Model

Authors

  • M. Ramadhevi Aarupadai veedu Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation, Chennai-600100, Tamilnadu.
  • S. Rajaprakash Aarupadai veedu Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation, Chennai-600100, Tamilnadu.

Keywords:

conceptual learning, deductive, inductive, multiagent, random classifier, STEM

Abstract

The study illustrates a multiagent-based conceptual learning framework for analytical learners using logical, linguistic, numerical, and abstract reasoning skills. This approach provides tailored and adaptable learning paths based on strengths and weaknesses to improve learning. Multiple agents provide individualized feedback and coaching to enhance analytical skills holistically. Engagement, learning style, and material availability are considered while calculating reasoning scores. This analysis helps the framework offer relevant learning materials and activities by understanding each learner's requirements and preferences. The multiagent-based strategy also encourages peer-to-peer learning and knowledge sharing, improving the learning experience. The proposed methodology uses a reasoning score and a random forest classifier to predict learners' learning styles. The model compares to inductive, deductive, and transductive machine learning models. The random forest classifier model beats other learning methods. The random forest classifier may be able to effectively predict learners' learning styles. In addition, multiagent-based learning improves collaboration and enables customized learning experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

White, D.W. (2014). What Is STEM Education and Why Is It Important.

Hsu, R.C., & Tsai, T. (2022). Assessing the Impact of a Project-Based Learning Robotics Course with Integrating of STEM Education Using Content Analysis Method. European Journal of STEM Education.

Arztmann, M., Hornstra, L., Jeuring, J., & Kester, L. (2022). Effects of games in STEM education: a meta-analysis on the moderating role of student background characteristics. Studies in Science Education, 59, 109 - 145.

Xu, W., & Fan, O. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 1-20.

Dökme, I., Açıksöz, A., &Koyunlu Ünlü, Z. (2022). Investigation of STEM fields motivation among female students in science education colleges. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 1-14.

Nderu-Boddington, E. (2008). Theories of Intelligence, Learning, and Motivation as a Basis for Praxis.

Hsu, R.C., & Tsai, T. (2022). Assessing the Impact of a Project-Based Learning Robotics Course with Integrating of STEM Education Using Content Analysis Method. European Journal of STEM Education.

Pérez, Y.G., & Kholod, I.I. (2021). Machine Learning Agent Communication Language Based on ACL and PMML. 2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus), 573-576.

Uskov, V.L., Bakken, J.P., Byerly, A., & Shah, A. (2019). Machine Learning-based Predictive Analytics of Student Academic Performance in STEM Education. 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1370-1376.

Oprea, M. (2021). INTEGRATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN STEM EDUCATION THROUGH IOT PROJECTS BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING. ELearning and Software for Education.

Aly, M., & Hasan, M.R. (2019). Improving STEM Performance by Leveraging Machine Learning Models.

Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G., Chen, M.A., & Liang, J. (2023). Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: a systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model. International Journal of STEM Education, 10.

Lu, J., Mou, J., & Li, P. (2023). Interpretive Analyses of Learner Dropout Prediction in Online STEM Courses. 2023 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE), 1-9.

Parkavi R., Karthikeyan P., Sheik Abdullah A., Predicting academic performance of learners with the three domains of learning data using neuro-fuzzy model and machine learning algorithms, Journal of Engineering Research,2023,ISSN 2307-1877,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.09.006.

Wolfgang Maass, Veda C. Storey,Pairing conceptual modeling with machine learning,Data& Knowledge Engineering,Volume 134,2021,101909,ISSN 0169-023X,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2021.101909.

Alice Bertoletti, Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, Tommaso Agasisti,Higher education systems and regional economic development in Europe: A combined approach using econometric and machine learning methods,Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,Volume 82, Part A,2022,101231,ISSN 0038-0121,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101231.

Naveed Saif, Sajid Ullah Khan, Imrab Shaheen, Abdullah Alotaibi, Marim M. Alnfiai, Mohammad Arif,Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism,Computers in Human Behavior,2023,108097,ISSN 0747-5632,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097.

Mikhail Deev, Alexey Finogeev,Application of the convergent education model in the development of a smart learning environment,Telematics and Informatics Reports,Volume 10,2023,100051,ISSN 2772-5030,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2023.100051.

B. RIERA, D. ANNEBICQUE, B. VIGÁRIO, HOME I/O: an example of Human-Machine Systems concepts applied to STEM education, IFAC-PapersOnLine,

Volume 49, Issue 19, 2016, Pages 233-238, ISSN 2405-8963,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.530.

Susnjak, T., Ramaswami, G.S. & Mathrani, A. Learning analytics dashboard: a tool for providing actionable insights to learners. Int J EducTechnol High Educ 19, 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00313-7.

Denden, M., Tlili, A., Essalmi, F. et al. Implicit modelling of learners’ personalities in a game-based learning environment using their gaming behaviours. Smart Learn. Environ. 5, 29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0078-6.

Hadyaoui, A., Cheniti-Belcadhi, L. Ontology-based group assessment analytics framework for performances prediction in project-based collaborative learning. Smart Learn. Environ. 10, 43 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00262-w

Renu Sabharwal, Shah Jahan Miah,An intelligent literature review: adopting inductive approach to define machine learning applications in the clinical domain, Journal of big data,9,1, 2023, doi:10.1186/s40537-022-00605-3.

Alshboul O, Shehadeh A, Almasabha G, Almuflih AS. Extreme Gradient Boosting-Based Machine Learning Approach for Green Building Cost Prediction. Sustainability. 2022; 14(11):6651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116651

Xiao, Y., Feng, J. & Liu, B. A new transductive learning method with universum data. Appl Intell 51, 5571–5583 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02113-4

Downloads

Published

24.03.2024

How to Cite

Ramadhevi, M. ., & Rajaprakash, S. . (2024). Utilizing Multiagent-Based Conceptual Learning in STEM Education for Analytical Learners through a Random Classifier Model. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(18s), 273–280. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/4971

Issue

Section

Research Article