Enhanced Animal Detection in Complex Outdoor Environments Using Modified Yolo V7

Authors

  • Johnwesily Chappidi School of Computer Science and Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravathi
  • Divya Meena Sundaram School of Computer Science and Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravathi

Keywords:

Anima detection, YOLO v7, Challenging image conditions, R-CNN

Abstract

Detecting animals accurately and quickly in complicated outdoor settings is important for getting work done efficiently. But it's not easy because the places where animals live have complicated environmental conditions. This research proposes a novel animal detection method that uses the YOLO V7 network to overcome these challenges. Thorough evaluations and comparisons are performed on various detection networks like YOLO V3-spp, YOLO V5s, Faster R-CNN, and YOLO V7, which are meticulously conducted. The rigorous assessments identify YOLO V7 as the preeminent performer. The findings are noteworthy, as the model exhibits exemplary detection capabilities and robust adaptability in complex field environments. It attains a noteworthy mean Average Precision (mAP) of 96.03%, accompanied by impressive precision, recall, F1 score, and an average detection time of 94.76%, 95.54%, 95.15%, and 0.025 seconds per image, respectively. This study underscores the profound efficacy of uniting YOLO V7 for animal detection within challenging field conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., & Magrath, M. J. (2021). A comprehensive overview of technologies for species and habitat monitoring and conservation. BioScience, 71(10), 1038-1062.

Petso, T., Jamisola Jr, R. S., & Mpoeleng, D. (2022). Review on methods used for wildlife species and individual identification. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 68(1), 3.

Peng, J., Wang, D., Liao, X., Shao, Q., Sun, Z., Yue, H., & Ye, H. (2020). Wild animal survey using UAS imagery and deep learning: modified Faster R-CNN for kiang detection in Tibetan Plateau. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 169, 364-376.

Schindler, F., & Steinhage, V. (2021). Identification of animals and recognition of their actions in wildlife videos using deep learning techniques. Ecological Informatics, 61, 101215.

Saxena, A., Gupta, D. K., & Singh, S. (2021). An animal detection and collision avoidance system using deep learning. In Advances in Communication and Computational Technology: Select Proceedings of ICACCT 2019 (pp. 1069-1084). Springer Singapore.

Carl, C., Schönfeld, F., Profft, I., Klamm, A., & Landgraf, D. (2020). Automated detection of European wild mammal species in camera trap images with an existing and pre-trained computer vision model. European journal of wildlife research, 66, 1-7.

Tabak, M. A., Norouzzadeh, M. S., Wolfson, D. W., Newton, E. J., Boughton, R. K., Ivan, J. S., & Miller, R. S. (2020). Improving the accessibility and transferability of machine learning algorithms for identification of animals in camera trap images: MLWIC2. Ecology and evolution, 10(19), 10374-10383.

Sabeenian, R., Deivanai, N., & Mythili, B. (2020). Wild animals intrusion detection using deep learning techniques. Int. J. Pharm. Res, 12(4), 1053-1058.

Sayagavi, A. V., Sudarshan, T. S. B., & Ravoor, P. C. (2021). Deep learning methods for animal recognition and tracking to detect intrusions. In Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems: Proceedings of ICTIS 2020, Volume 2 (pp. 617-626). Springer Singapore.

da Silva Santos, A., de Medeiros, V. W. C., & Gonçalves, G. E. (2023). Monitoring and classification of cattle behavior: A survey. Smart Agricultural Technology, 3, 100091.

Xu, W., Zhang, X., Yao, L., Xue, W., & Wei, B. (2020). A multi-view CNN-based acoustic classification system for automatic animal species identification. Ad Hoc Networks, 102, 102115.

Su, X., Ullah, I., Liu, X., & Choi, D. (2020). A review of underwater localization techniques, algorithms, and challenges. Journal of Sensors, 2020.

Petso, T., Jamisola Jr, R. S., & Mpoeleng, D. (2022). Review on methods used for wildlife species and individual identification. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 68(1), 3.

Li, L., Dong, B., Rigall, E., Zhou, T., Dong, J., & Chen, G. (2021). Marine animal segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 32(4), 2303-2314.

Manasa, K., Paschyanti, D. V., Vanama, G., Vikas, S. S., Kommineni, M., & Roshini, A. (2021, July). Wildlife surveillance using deep learning with YOLOv3 model. In 2021 6th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) (pp. 1798-1804). IEEE.

Ma, D., & Yang, J. (2022, October). Yolo-animal: An efficient wildlife detection network based on improved yolov5. In 2022 International Conference on Image Processing, Computer Vision and Machine Learning (ICICML) (pp. 464-468). IEEE.

Shanthakumari, R., Nalini, C., Vinothkumar, S., Govindaraj, B., Dharani, S., & Chindhana, S. (2022, March). Image detection and recognition of different species of animals using deep learning. In 2022 International Mobile and Embedded Technology Conference (MECON) (pp. 236-241). IEEE.

Altobel, M. Z., & Sah, M. (2021). Tiger Detection Using Faster R-CNN for Wildlife Conservation. In 14th International Conference on Theory and Application of Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing–ICAFS-2020 14 (pp. 572-579). Springer International Publishing.

Yang, W., Liu, T., Jiang, P., Qi, A., Deng, L., Liu, Z., & He, Y. (2023). A Forest Wildlife Detection Algorithm Based on Improved YOLOv5s. Animals, 13(19), 3134.

Wang, F., He, P., Zhang, T., & Liang, D. (2022, October). Wildlife detection algorithm based on Inv-YOLOv5m. In 2022 Global Reliability and Prognostics and Health Management (PHM-Yantai) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

XiaoAn, B., LinQing, Z., XiaoMei, T., Biao, W., QingQi, Z., YuTing, J., & Na, Z. (2023). Wildlife target detection based on improved YOLOX-s network.

Dai, W., Wang, H., Song, Y., & Xin, Y. (2021, May). Wildlife small object detection based on enhanced network in ecological surveillance. In 2021 33rd Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) (pp. 1164-1169). IEEE.

Roy, A. M., Bhaduri, J., Kumar, T., & Raj, K. (2023). WilDect-YOLO: An efficient and robust computer vision-based accurate object localization model for automated endangered wildlife detection. Ecological Informatics, 75, 101919.

Panicker, S. A., Kumar, R. V., Ramachandran, A., & Padmavathi, S. (2021). Analysis of Image Processing Techniques to Segment the Target Animal in Non-uniformly Illuminated and Occluded Images. In Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies: Proceedings of ICICCT 2020 (pp. 15-26). Springer Singapore.

Francisco, F. A., Nührenberg, P., & Jordan, A. (2020). High-resolution, non-invasive animal tracking and reconstruction of local environment in aquatic ecosystems. Movement ecology, 8(1), 1-12.

Nguyen, H., Maclagan, S. J., Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, T., Flemons, P., Andrews, K., ... & Phung, D. (2017, October). Animal recognition and identification with deep convolutional neural networks for automated wildlife monitoring. In 2017 IEEE international conference on data science and advanced Analytics (DSAA) (pp. 40-49). IEEE.

Kellenberger, B., Marcos, D., Lobry, S., & Tuia, D. (2019). Half a percent of labels is enough: Efficient animal detection in UAV imagery using deep CNNs and active learning. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(12), 9524-9533.

Dulal, R., Zheng, L., Kabir, M. A., McGrath, S., Medway, J., Swain, D., & Swain, W. (2022, November). Automatic Cattle Identification using YOLOv5 and Mosaic Augmentation: A Comparative Analysis. In 2022 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

Downloads

Published

24.03.2024

How to Cite

Chappidi, J. ., & Sundaram, D. M. . (2024). Enhanced Animal Detection in Complex Outdoor Environments Using Modified Yolo V7 . International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(19s), 375–382. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/5076

Issue

Section

Research Article