Assessment of Performance and Industry Segmentation in the Manufacturing Sector: An Empirical Study

Authors

  • Harshita Kaushik Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur
  • Sweta Kumari Department of ISME, ATLAS SkillTech University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • B. P. Singh Maharishi University of Information Technology, Lucknow, India
  • Aravindan Munusamy Kalidhas JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Karnataka, India
  • Sunila Choudhary Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, India

Keywords:

(TIV-FT), Chi square (X2), Performance (PER), Segmenting, Manufacturing industries

Abstract

The Triangular Interval-Valued (TIV) Fuzzy TOPSIS (TIV-FT) Technique  had been in this research by investigators to categorize factories according to their efficiency. Utilizing a common survey with a simple randomization technique, they gathered information from 280 factories in Assam. The investigators used programmed to analyze the information. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), (TIV-FT)  Technique , Chi-square (X2) analysis, and Correspondent Analysis (CA) were among the analytical techniques they used. The examiners evaluated the contributions provided by various variables in influencing the performance (PER) of the manufacturing industries by considering factor loadings that are of the goods. The investigators divided the production sectors under three categories utilizing the (TIV-FT) Technique ology. Furthermore, they discovered within (X2)  analysis that five demographic characteristics of the respondents—namely, the amount from decades the organization had been in operation, the size of the sector, the sort of producing goods, the plenty of workers, or the position of the producing facility—were strongly linked to division from factories while the outcome. Using complex statistics including an examination of the impact of different economic and demographic features, the research's purpose was to offer suggestions for the success of factories in Assam.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cagno, E., Accordini, D., Trianni, A., Katic, M., Ferrari, N. and Gambaro, F., 2022. Understanding the impacts of energy efficiency measures on a Company’s operational performance: A new framework. Applied Energy, 328, p.120118

Yong, J.Y., Yusliza, M.Y., Ramayah, T., Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J., Sehnem, S. and Mani, V., 2020. Pathways towards sustainability in manufacturing organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), pp.212-228.

Al Breiki, M. and Nobanee, H., 2019. The role of financial management in promoting sustainable business practices and development. Available at SSRN 3472404.

Al Breiki, M. and Nobanee, H., 2019. The role of financial management in promoting sustainable business practices and development. Available at SSRN 3472404.

Gonçalves, T., Gaio, C. and Ferro, A., 2021. Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Moderating impact of economic cycles and financial performance. Sustainability, 13(17), p.9969.

Heidary Dahooie, J., Estiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K. and Xu, Z., 2022. A novel hybrid fuzzy DEA-fuzzy ARAS Technique for prioritizing high-performance innovation-oriented human resource practices in high tech SME’s. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(2), pp.883-908.

Nwaiwu, F., Duduci, M., Chromjakova, F. and Otekhile, C.A.F., 2020. Industry 4.0 concepts within the Czech SME manufacturing sector: an empirical assessment of critical success factors. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), pp.58-70.

da Silva, P.C., de Oliveira Neto, G.C., Correia, J.M.F. and Tucci, H.N.P., 2021. Evaluation of economic, environmental and operational performance of the adoption of cleaner production: Survey in large textile industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, p.123855.

Kneipp, J.M., Gomes, C.M., Bichueti, R.S., Frizzo, K. and Perlin, A.P., 2019. Sustainable innovation practices and their relationship with the performance of industrial companies. Revista de Gestão, 26(2), pp.94-111.

Abdel-Basset, M., Ding, W., Mohamed, R. and Metawa, N., 2020. An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries. Risk Management, 22, pp.192-218.

Neri, A., Cagno, E., Lepri, M. and Trianni, A., 2021. A triple bottom line balanced set of key performance indicators to measure the sustainability performance of industrial supply chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, pp.648-691.

Godina, R., Ribeiro, I., Matos, F., T. Ferreira, B., Carvalho, H. and Peças, P., 2020. Impact assessment of additive manufacturing on sustainable business models in industry 4.0 context. Sustainability, 12(17), p.7066.

Taques, F.H., López, M.G., Basso, L.F. and Areal, N., 2021. Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), pp.11-26.

Altıparmak, S.C. and Xiao, B., 2021. A market assessment of additive manufacturing potential for the aerospace industry. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 68, pp.728-738.

Singh, A.K., Singh, B.J. and Ashraf, S.N., 2020. Implications of intellectual property protection, and science and technological development in the manufacturing sector in selected economies. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education, 7(1), pp.16-35.

Copuš, L., Šajgalíková, H. and Wojčák, E., 2019. Organizational culture and its motivational potential in manufacturing industry: subculture perspective. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, pp.360-367.

Downloads

Published

24.03.2024

How to Cite

Kaushik, H. ., Kumari, S. ., Singh, B. P. ., Kalidhas, A. M. ., & Choudhary, S. . (2024). Assessment of Performance and Industry Segmentation in the Manufacturing Sector: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(19s), 774–781. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/5209

Issue

Section

Research Article