Classification of ADHD and its Sub-Types using Machine learning Models

Authors

  • Samyuktha S., M. B. Anandarajuuthor

Keywords:

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Convolutional Neural Networks, Cross validation, functional MRI, machine learning, statistical metrics.

Abstract

ADHD, a complex neurodevelopment disorder, exhibits diverse manifestations across individuals, making its diagnosis challenging. Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) offer a crucial edge in ADHD detection due to their proficiency in processing and analyzing intricate patterns within neuroimaging data, such as fMRI scans. Given the multi-dimensional nature of ADHD, CNNs excel in capturing subtle neurological variations that might escape conventional analysis, thereby providing a more nuanced and accurate approach to discerning the complex patterns associated with this condition. Their ability to automatically extract hierarchical features from imaging data makes CNNs indispensable in unraveling the intricate neurobiological markers crucial for ADHD identification and classification. Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) have revolutionized medical imaging, offering unprecedented potential in the diagnosis and categorization of complex conditions like Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and its subtypes. In the context of ADHD, CNN and VGG-16 models are trained on functional MRI (fMRI) scans to identify unique neural patterns associated with the disorder. This paper introduces machine learning (ML) models designed for ADHD classification, assessed using various statistical metrics such as accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall through 5-fold cross-validation. The results from the study showcase the capability of the Identification of Lung Cancer (IOLC) model in identifying lung cancer, gauged through accuracy, precision, recall, F-Measure, and error rate metrics. The model demonstrates 91.68% accuracy, 89.8% precision, 89.3% recall and 89.2% F-Measure. The ROC curve confirms the effectiveness of the proposed model as a classifier for ADHD types, and comparative results against VGG-16 demonstrate the proposed model's superior performance, albeit moderately.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

, S. V., Banaschewski, T., Coghill, D., Zheng, Y., Biederman, J., Bellgrove, M. A., Wang, Y. (2021). “The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 evidence-based conclusions about the disorder”. Neuroscience &Biobehavioral Reviews. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.022

[W. Majeed, M. Magnuson, et al., “Spatiotemporal dynamics of low frequency BOLD fluctuations in rats and humans,” Neuro Image, vol. 54, pp. 1140–1150, 2011.

Lindquist, Martin A, C. Waugh, and T. D. Wager. “Modelingstate-related fMRI activity using change-point theory.” Neuro image 35.3(2007):1125-1141.

Lian, Zhi chao, et al. “Exploring functional brain dynamics via aBayesian connectivity change point model.” 2014 IEEE 11th InternationalSymposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2014) IEEE, 2014.

Chang, Catie, and G. H. Glover. “Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI.” Neuroimaging 50.1(2010):81-98.

Gülay Ç çek, A. Akan, and Z. Orman. “Classification of ADHD by using textural analysis of MR images.” Medical Technologies National Congress 2017:1-4.

Miao, Bo, and Y. Zhang. “A feature selection method for classificationof ADHD.” International Conference on Information, Cyberneticsand Computational Social Systems 2017:21-25.

Sudha, D., and M. P. Rani. “Gait Classification for ADHD Children Using Modified Dual Tree ComplexWaveletTransform.” WorldCongress on Computing and Communication Technologies IEEE Computer Society, 2017:215-218.

Che-Wei Chang, Chien-Chang Ho and Jyh-Horng Chen “ADHD classification by a texture analysis of anatomical brain MRI data.”

Athena Taymourtash, FarnazGhassemi “Independent Component analysis of sparse transformed EEG signal for ADHD/Normal Adult classification.” 978-1-4799-1972-7/15/> 31.00 c 2015 IEEE

Yan Zhang: ADHD classification by feature space separation with sparse representation: DSL 2018: 1-5

Marcano, Juan L. Lopez, M. A. Bell, and A. A. L. Beex. “Classification of ADHD and Non-ADHD using theta/beta power ratio features.” IEEE Embs International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics IEEE, 2017.

F.M. Grisales-Franco, J.M. Medina-Salcedo, D.M. Ovalle-Mart nez3, J.D. Mart nez-Vargas1(B), D.G. Garc a-Murillo1, and G.Castellanos-Dominguez1 EEG Source Imaging Based on DynamicSparse Coding as ADHD Biomarker IWINAC 2017, Part I, LNCS 10337.

S. Ahmed Salman, Z. Lian, M. Saleem and Y. Zhang, “Functional Connectivity Based Classification of ADHD Using Different Atlases,” 2020 IEEE International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC), 2020, pp. 62-66, doi: 10.1109/PIC50277.2020.9350749.

J. Wang, W. Liao and X. Jin, “Classification of ADHD Using fissional Based on Functional Connectivity and Interval Features,” 2021 6th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Applications (ICCIA), 2021, pp. 113-117, doi: 10.1109/ICCIA52886.2021.00029.

S. Liu et al., “Deep Spatio-Temporal Representation and Ensemble Classification for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder,” in IEEETransactions on Neural Systms and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 29, pp. 1-10, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3019063

Y. Tang, J. Jiang, M. Li, Y. Chen and X. Meng, “ADHD classificationvia auto-encoding network with non-imaging data fusion,” 2021 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association AnnualSummit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), 2021, pp. 1328-1332.

R. Satpathy, T. Choudhury, S. Satpathy, S. N. Mohanty, and X. Zhang, Data Analytics in Bioinformatics: A Machine Learning Perspective, John Wiley & Sons, 2021.

J. P. Amezquita-sanchez, N. Mammone, F. C. Morabito, and H. Adeli, “A New dispersion entropy and fuzzy logic system methodology for automated classification of dementia stages using electroencephalograms,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 201, p. 106446, 2021.

A. Sharma, J. K. Rai, and R. P. Tewari, “Schizophrenia detection using biomarkers from electroencephalogram signals,” IETE Journal of Research, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 3056–3064, 2022.

S. K. Khare, V. Bajaj, and U. R. Acharya, “Detection of Parkinson’s disease using automated tunable Q wavelet transform technique with EEG signals,” Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 679–689, 2021.

S. L. Oh, Y. Hagiwara, U. Raghavendra et al., “A deep learning approach for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from EEG signals,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 32, no. 15, pp. 10927–10933, 2020.

M. Saeedi, A. Saeedi, and A. Maghsoudi, “Major depressive disorder assessment via enhanced k-nearest neighbor method and EEG signals,” Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1007–1018, 2020.

R. A. Movahed, G. P. Jahromi, S. Shahyad, and G. H. Meftahi, “A major depressive disorder classification framework based on EEG signals using statistical , spectral , wavelet , functional connectivity , and nonlinear analysis,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 358, p. 109209, 2021.

R. Catherine Joy, S. Thomas George, A. Albert Rajan, and M. S. P. S. P. Subathra, “Detection of ADHD from EEG signals using different entropy measures and ANN,” Clinical EEG and Neuroscience,vol. 53, no. 1, 2021.

Downloads

Published

16.03.2024

How to Cite

M. B. Anandarajuuthor, S. S. . (2024). Classification of ADHD and its Sub-Types using Machine learning Models. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(3), 1256–1262. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/5406

Issue

Section

Research Article