Network Selection over Heterogeneous Health System Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

Authors

  • Kumaran K., Sivasakthi P., Pandiyan G., Saranya G., Kirubakaran S., Nithish V.

Keywords:

Heterogeneous mobile nodes, Deep Reinforcement Learning, Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT) Energy efficient routing protocol (EERPS), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)

Abstract

The proposed method involves using a combination of techniques such as energy-efficient routing, heterogeneous mobile nodes, region-based grid formation, GWO optimization, LSTM prediction, ESPIRIT estimation, and active zones to minimize the overall energy consumption. It works by first randomly deploying mobile nodes throughout the experimental region. Next, the area is split up into grids according to certain parameters such as remaining energy levels and distances between nodes. Every grid has a base node that is chosen using GWO optimization. Next, a deep learning-based machine learning algorithm known as LSTM is employed to predict the future direction of movement of each mobile node within the grid. Finally, the sender node selects the closest node in the active region to transmit data to. Sensor networks are designed to facilitate efficient information sharing by allowing for the distribution of resources and information across a decentralized network. Ad-hoc networks, in particular, have gained popularity due to their ability to operate in dynamic environments where traditional wired connections may be impractical or impossible. In order to effectively communicate within these networks, various protocols have been developed to manage network traffic and ensure reliable delivery of messages. One example of such a protocol is the Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) algorithm, which uses a combination of flooding and source routing techniques to efficiently route packets through the network.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. M. Tapia, S. S. Intille, W. Haskell, K. Larson, J. Wright, A. King, and R. Friedman, ‘‘Real-time recognition of physical activities and their intensities using wireless accelerometers and a heart rate monitor,’’ in Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Symp. Wearable Comput., Oct. 2007, pp. 37–40.

F. Lau, C. Kuziemsky, M. Price, and J. Gardner, ‘‘A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies,’’ J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 637–645, Nov. 2010.

F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu, and S. Addepalli, ‘‘Fog computing and its role in the Internet of Things,’’ in Proc. 1st Ed. MCC Workshop Mobile Cloud Comput. (MCC), pp. 13–16, 2012.

R. Cook, ‘‘Exploring the benefits and challenges of telehealth,’’ Nursing times, vol. 108, no. 24, pp. 16–17, 2012.

Kumaran, K., & Sasikala, E. (2023). An efficient task offloading and resource allocation using dynamic arithmetic optimized double deep Q-network in cloud edge platform. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 16(2), 958-979.

S. M. R. Islam, D. Kwak, M. Humaun Kabir, M. Hossain, and K.-S. Kwak, ‘‘The Internet of Things for health care: A comprehensive survey,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 3, pp. 678–708, 2015.

M. S. Mahmud, H. Wang, A. M. Esfar-E-Alam, and H. Fang, ‘‘A wireless health monitoring system using mobile phone accessories,’’ IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2009–2018, Dec. 2017.

C. Crema, A. Depari, A. Flammini, E. Sisinni, T. Haslwanter, and S. Salzmann, ‘‘IMU-based solution for automatic detection and classification of exercises in the fitness scenario,’’ in Proc. IEEE Sensors Appl. Symp. (SAS), Mar. 2017, pp. 1–6.

M. Bhatia and S. K. Sood, ‘‘A comprehensive health assessment framework to facilitate IoT-assisted smart workouts: A predictive healthcare perspective,’’ Comput. Ind., vols. 92–93, pp. 50–66, Nov. 2017

Emre Oner Tartan and Cebrail Ciflikli, “An Android Application for Geolocation Based Health Monitoring, Consultancy and Alarm System”, IEEE International Conference on Computer Software & Applications, DOI 10.1109/COMPSAC.2018.10254, pp. 341-344, 2018

W. R. Thompson, ‘‘Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2019,’’ ACSM’S Health Fitness J., vol. 22, no. 6, pp.10–17, 2018.

C. Shen, B.-J. Ho, and M. Srivastava, ‘‘MiLift: Efficient smartwatch-based workout tracking using automatic segmentation,’’ IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1609–1622, Jul. 2018.

ZephyrT Performance Systems | Performance Monitoring Technology. Accessed: Apr. 12, 2020.

Afzaal Hussain, Kashif Zafar and Abdul Rauf Baig, “Fog-Centric IoT Based Framework for Healthcare Monitoring, Management and Early Warning System” IEEE Internet Things, pp. 74168- 74179, Apr. 2021.

“HeDI: Healthcare Device Interoperability for IoT-Based e-Health Nidhi Pathak, Sudip Misra, Anandarup Mukherjee and Neeraj Kumar, Platforms” IEEE Internet Things, VOL. 8, NO. 23, pp. 16845-16852, DECEMBER 1, 2021

Xiaonan Wang and Yajing Song, “Edge-Assisted IoMT-Based Smart-Home Monitoring System for the Elderly with Chronic Diseases” IEEE Sensors letter, VOL. 7, NO. 2, pp. 7500204- 7500204, FEBRUARY 2023.

Kumaran, K., & Sasikala, E. (2023, March). Deep Reinforcement Learning algorithms for Low Latency Edge Computing Systems. In 2023 3rd International conference on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Saranya, G., & Sasikala, E. (2023). An efficient computational offloading framework using HAA optimization-based deep reinforcement learning in edge-based cloud computing architecture. Knowledge and Information Systems, 65(1), 409-433.

Downloads

Published

24.03.2024

How to Cite

Pandiyan G., Saranya G., Kirubakaran S., Nithish V., K. K. S. P. . (2024). Network Selection over Heterogeneous Health System Using Deep Reinforcement Learning. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(3), 1391–1399. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/5530

Issue

Section

Research Article