Transformed image features can improve machine learning performance for detecting benign-malignant of breast cancer

Authors

  • Anak Agung Ngurah Gunawan, Putu Astri Novianti, Anak Agung Ngurah Frady Cakra Negara, Anak Agung Ngurah Bagaskara.

Keywords:

Machine Learning, Breast Cancer, Benign, Malignant, Mammography, transformation data.

Abstract

Breast cancer is a commonly diagnosed disease in women. This research aimed to create a transformed image features can improve machine learning performance for detecting benign-malignant of breast cancer.This research was quantitative research. Data was taken from the radiology installation at Doctor Sutomo Hospital from 2010 until now, where there were 670 data, consisting of 342 benign and 328 malignant. The data was distributed randomly; 70% was used for training, while the remaining 30% was used for testing. Every mammography had nine features: Entropy, Entropy of hdiff, contrast, Angular second moment, Angular second moment of hdiff Inverse difference moment, mean, Mean hdiff, and deviation. This research developed each feature into ten sub-features, namely Entropy at a distance of 1 pixel to Entropy at a distance of 10 pixels, and so on until the mean Hdiff at a distance of 10 pixels. Thus, the total features used in this research were 90 features. This research used three types of transformation, namely original, binary transformation, and bipolar transformation. Besides, this research also used three types of methods, namely 90 features, average, and optimization. Furthermore, this research sought the best performance based on the widest ROC graph, highest accuracy, and lowest false negative rate. In addition, this research also sought the best types of transformation and methods. Models with optimization types with binary and bipolar transformations had the highest positive true values. Models with optimization types with binary and bipolar transformations both had the lowest false negative values. The average type model with bipolar transformation had the highest accuracy value, followed by binary transformation. Models with optimization types with binary and bipolar transformations both had the highest ROC area. Based on the three methods and three transformations proposed, it was found that the optimization method and types of binary and bipolar transformations had the best performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. A. Shafei et al., ‘Differential expression of the BCAT isoforms between breast cancer subtypes’, Breast Cancer, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 592–607, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01197-7.

J. Wang, R. Zhao, and J. Cheng, ‘Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis’, Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 149, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110219.

D. S. Grewal et al., ‘The most widely used is mammography, which has false- negative results in 10e15% cases.’, Med. J. Armed Forces India, no. xxxx, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.01.015.

P. Pati et al., ‘Hierarchical graph representations in digital pathology’, Med. Image Anal., vol. 75, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102264.

K. Loizidou, R. Elia, and C. Pitris, ‘Computer-aided breast cancer detection and classification in mammography: A comprehensive review’, Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 153. Elsevier Ltd, Feb. 01, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106554.

J. Ma et al., ‘Distinguishing benign and malignant lesions on contrast-enhanced breast cone-beam CT with deep learning neural architecture search’, Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 142, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109878.

Y. Yu et al., ‘Application of a shear-wave elastography prediction model to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions and the adjustment of ultrasound Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classifications’, Clin. Radiol., vol. 77, no. 2, pp. e147–e153, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.10.016.

H. Sung et al., ‘Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries’, CA. Cancer J. Clin., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021, doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.

K. Tamura et al., ‘Phase 1 study of oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) amcenestrant (SAR439859), in Japanese women with ER-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (AMEERA-2)’, Breast Cancer, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 506–517, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01443-8.

M. Zou et al., ‘Knockdown of CAVEOLIN-1 Sensitizes Human Basal-Like Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells to Radiation’, Cell. Physiol. Biochem., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 778–791, 2017, doi: 10.1159/000485291.

S. K. Saha et al., ‘Prognostic and clinico-pathological significance of BIN1 in breast cancer’, Informatics Med. Unlocked, vol. 19, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100327.

A. Möhl et al., ‘The impact of cardiovascular disease on all-cause and cancer mortality: results from a 16-year follow-up of a German breast cancer case–control study’, Breast Cancer Res., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01680-x.

M. Zubair, S. Wang, and N. Ali, ‘Advanced Approaches to Breast Cancer Classification and Diagnosis’, Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 11. Frontiers Media S.A., Feb. 26, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.632079.

V. Giannakeas, V. Sopik, and S. A. Narod, ‘Association of a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Death from Breast Cancer’, JAMA Netw. Open, vol. 3, no. 9, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17124.

C. Mattiuzzi and G. Lippi, ‘Current cancer epidemiology’, J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 217–222, 2019, doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191008.001.

R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, H. E. Fuchs, and A. Jemal, ‘Cancer statistics, 2022’, CA. Cancer J. Clin., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 7–33, 2022, doi: 10.3322/caac.21708.

R. L. Siegel, A. N. Giaquinto, and A. Jemal, ‘Cancer statistics, 2024.’, CA. Cancer J. Clin., no. October 2023, pp. 12–49, 2024, doi: 10.3322/caac.21820.

H. S. Aase et al., ‘Mammographic features and screening outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography’, Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 141, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109753.

L. Wang, P. Wang, H. Shao, J. Li, and Q. Yang, ‘Role of contrast-enhanced mammography in the preoperative detection of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: a comparison with low-energy image and magnetic resonance imaging’, Eur. Radiol., 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10312-z.

V. Jolidon, ‘Gender inequality and mammography screening: Does living with a partner improve women’s mammography uptake?’, Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 298, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114875.

T. Sterlingova, E. Nylander, L. Almqvist, and B. Møller Christensen, ‘Factors affecting women’s participation in mammography screening in Nordic countries: A systematic review’, Radiography, vol. 29, no. 5. W.B. Saunders Ltd, pp. 878–885, Aug. 01, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.06.010.

J. J. K. Liow et al., ‘Attitudes and barriers to mammography screening in Singaporean women through the eyes of their adult children: A focus group study’, SSM - Qual. Res. Heal., vol. 2, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100168.

H. I. Greenwood et al., ‘Outcomes of screening mammography performed prior to fertility treatment in women ages 40-49’, Clin. Imaging, vol. 80, no. August, pp. 359–363, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.028.

M. Kalambo, T. S. Omofoye, E. Cohen, J. W. T. Leung, and T. Nghiem, ‘What Women Want: Real Time Results for Screening Mammography in the Era of Value-Based Care | A Single Institution Experience During the COVID-19 SARS-COV2 Pandemic’, Asploro J. Biomed. Clin. Case Reports, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2023, doi: 10.36502/2023/asjbccr.6309.

D. Braithwaite et al., ‘Clinician and patient perspectives on screening mammography among women age 75 and older: A pilot study of a novel decision aid’, PEC Innov., vol. 2, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100132.

J. H. Yoon, K. Han, H. J. Suh, J. H. Youk, S. E. Lee, and E. K. Kim, ‘Artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted detection/diagnosis (AI-CAD) for screening mammography: Outcomes of AI-CAD in the mammographic interpretation workflow’, Eur. J. Radiol. Open, vol. 11, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100509.

S. Bayard et al., ‘Screening mammography mitigates breast cancer disparities through early detection of triple negative breast cancer’, Clin. Imaging, vol. 80, pp. 430–437, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.013.

C. Kuhl et al., ‘Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: The EVA trial’, J. Clin. Oncol., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1450–1457, 2010, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0839.

M. Morrow, J. Waters, and E. Morris, ‘MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment’, Lancet, vol. 378, no. 9805, pp. 1804–1811, 2011, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61350-0.

A. Izumori et al., ‘Usefulness of second-look ultrasonography using anatomical breast structures as indicators for magnetic resonance imaging-detected breast abnormalities’, Breast Cancer, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 129–139, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-01003-z.

Q. Zhang et al., ‘Quantitative transport mapping (QTM) for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesion: Comparison with traditional kinetics modeling and semi-quantitative enhancement curve characteristics.’, Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 86, pp. 86–93, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.10.039.

O. Olayinka, G. Kaur, R. Agarwal, V. Staradub, M. S. Chacho, and R. Vidhun, ‘Impact of multidisciplinary radiologic-pathologic correlation conference for benign image-guided breast biopsies on discordance rates and patient outcomes in a community teaching hospital’, in Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, W.B. Saunders, Apr. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151864.

X. Liu, Q. Chang, H. Wang, H. Qian, and Y. Jiang, ‘Discovery and function exploration of microRNA-155 as a molecular biomarker for early detection of breast cancer’, Breast Cancer, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 806–821, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12282-021-01215-2.

I. Sechopoulos, J. Teuwen, and R. Mann, ‘Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art’, Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 72. Academic Press, pp. 214–225, Jul. 01, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.06.002.

K. Suvarna Vani et al., ‘Detection and Classiication of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma using Artiicial Intelligence Detection and Classification of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma using Artificial Intelligence’, 2022, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2069384/v1.

B. Asadi and Q. Memon, ‘Efficient breast cancer detection via cascade deep learning network’, Int. J. Intell. Networks, vol. 4, no. January, pp. 46–52, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijin.2023.02.001.

Y. Amethiya, P. Pipariya, S. Patel, and M. Shah, ‘Comparative analysis of breast cancer detection using machine learning and biosensors’, Intelligent Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2. Elsevier B.V., pp. 69–81, May 01, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.imed.2021.08.004.

I. U. Haq, H. Ali, H. Y. Wang, C. Lei, and H. Ali, ‘Feature fusion and Ensemble learning-based CNN model for mammographic image classification’, J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 3310–3318, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.03.023.

R. Adam, K. Dell’Aquila, L. Hodges, T. Maldjian, and T. Q. Duong, ‘Deep learning applications to breast cancer detection by magnetic resonance imaging: a literature review’, Breast Cancer Res., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01687-4.

K. A. Hashiba, S. Mercaldo, S. L. Venkatesh, and M. Bahl, ‘Prediction of Surgical Upstaging Risk of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Machine Learning Models’, J. Breast Imaging, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2023, doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbad071.

W. C. Shia and D. R. Chen, ‘Classification of malignant tumors in breast ultrasound using a pretrained deep residual network model and support vector machine’, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., vol. 87, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101829.

V. P. C. Magboo and M. S. Magboo, ‘Machine learning classifiers on breast cancer recurrences’, in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2021, pp. 2742–2752. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.044.

Z. M. Sarvestani, J. Jamali, M. Taghizadeh, and M. H. F. Dindarloo, ‘A novel machine learning approach on texture analysis for automatic breast microcalcification diagnosis classification of mammogram images’, J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., vol. 149, no. 9, pp. 6151–6170, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04571-y.

B. Demirler Şimşir, K. B. Krug, C. Burke, M. Hellmich, D. Maintz, and E. Coche, ‘Possibility to discriminate benign from malignant breast lesions detected on dual-layer spectral CT-evaluation’, Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 142, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109832.

J. Chen et al., ‘Feasibility of using AI to auto-catch responsible frames in ultrasound screening for breast cancer diagnosis’, iScience, vol. 26, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105692.

F. M. Osman and M. H. Yap, ‘Adjusted Quick Shift Phase Preserving Dynamic Range Compression method for breast lesions segmentation’, Informatics Med. Unlocked, vol. 20, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100344.

E. M. F. El Houby and N. I. R. Yassin, ‘Malignant and nonmalignant classification of breast lesions in mammograms using convolutional neural networks’, Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 70, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102954.

M. Abdolahi, M. Salehi, I. Shokatian, and R. Reiazi, ‘Artificial intelligence in automatic classification of invasive ductal carcinoma breast cancer in digital pathology images’, Med. J. Islam. Repub. Iran, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.47176/mjiri.34.140.

A. D. Nelson and S. Krishna, ‘An effective approach for the nuclei segmentation from breast histopathological images using star-convex polygon’, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 218, pp. 1778–1790, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.156.

Y. Eroğlu, M. Yildirim, and A. Çinar, ‘Convolutional Neural Networks based classification of breast ultrasonography images by hybrid method with respect to benign, malignant, and normal using mRMR’, Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 133, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104407.

B. G. Deepa and S. Senthil, ‘Predicting invasive ductal carcinoma tissues in whole slide images of breast Cancer by using convolutional neural network model and multiple classifiers’, Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 8575–8596, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-12114-9.

Y. Wu, J. Wu, Y. Dou, N. Rubert, Y. Wang, and J. Deng, ‘A deep learning fusion model with evidence-based confidence level analysis for differentiation of malignant and benign breast tumors using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI’, Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 72, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103319.

K. Kawattikul, K. Sermsai, and P. Chomphuwiset, ‘Improving the sub-image classification of invasive ductal carcinoma in histology images’, Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 326–333, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v26.i1.pp326-333.

X. Y. Liew, N. Hameed, and J. Clos, ‘An investigation of XGBoost-based algorithm for breast cancer classification’, Mach. Learn. with Appl., vol. 6, p. 100154, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100154.

M. M. Rahman, M. S. I. Khan, and H. M. H. Babu, ‘BreastMultiNet: A multi-scale feature fusion method using deep neural network to detect breast cancer’, Array, vol. 16, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.array.2022.100256.

D. Song, Z. Zhang, W. Li, L. Yuan, and W. Zhang, ‘Judgment of benign and early malignant colorectal tumors from ultrasound images with deep multi-View fusion’, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 215, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106634.

J. M. Webb et al., ‘Comparing deep learning-based automatic segmentation of breast masses to expert interobserver variability in ultrasound imaging’, Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 139, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104966.

Y. S. Leong, K. Hasikin, K. W. Lai, N. Mohd Zain, and M. M. Azizan, ‘Microcalcification Discrimination in Mammography Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network: Towards Rapid and Early Breast Cancer Diagnosis’, Front. Public Heal., vol. 10, no. April, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.875305.

A. A. Joseph, M. Abdullahi, S. B. Junaidu, H. Ibrahim, and H. Chiroma, ‘Improved multi-classification of breast cancer histopathological images using handcrafted features and deep neural network (dense layer)’, Intell. Syst. with Appl., vol. 14, p. 66, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.iswa.2022.20.

Z. Assari, A. Mahloojifar, and N. Ahmadinejad, ‘Discrimination of benign and malignant solid breast masses using deep residual learning-based bimodal computer-aided diagnosis system’, Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 73, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103453.

Y. Zheng et al., ‘Application of transfer learning and ensemble learning in image-level classification for breast histopathology’, Intell. Med., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115–128, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.imed.2022.05.004.

M. Caballo, D. R. Pangallo, R. M. Mann, and I. Sechopoulos, ‘Deep learning-based segmentation of breast masses in dedicated breast CT imaging: Radiomic feature stability between radiologists and artificial intelligence’, Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 118, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103629.

S. Chaudhury, K. Sau, M. A. Khan, and M. Shabaz, ‘Deep transfer learning for IDC breast cancer detection using fast AI technique and Sqeezenet architecture’, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 20, no. 6. American Institute of Mathematical Sciences, pp. 10404–10427, 2023. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023457.

M. L. Huang and T. Y. Lin, ‘Considering breast density for the classification of benign and malignant mammograms’, Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 67, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102564.

B. A. Akinnuwesi, B. O. Macaulay, and B. S. Aribisala, ‘Breast cancer risk assessment and early diagnosis using Principal Component Analysis and support vector machine techniques’, Informatics Med. Unlocked, vol. 21, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100459.

S. Kadry, R. G. Crespo, E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Krishnamoorthy, and V. Rajinikanth, ‘Classification of Breast Thermal Images into Healthy/Cancer Group Using Pre-Trained Deep Learning Schemes’, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 218, pp. 24–34, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.398.

S. I. Khan, A. Shahrior, R. Karim, M. Hasan, and A. Rahman, ‘MultiNet: A deep neural network approach for detecting breast cancer through multi-scale feature fusion’, J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 6217–6228, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.08.004.

H. Aljuaid, N. Alturki, N. Alsubaie, L. Cavallaro, and A. Liotta, ‘Computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer classification using deep neural networks and transfer learning’, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 223, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106951.

B. W. Han et al., ‘Noninvasive discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions using genome-wide nucleosome profiles of plasma cell-free DNA’, Clin. Chim. Acta, vol. 520, pp. 95–100, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.06.008.

M. van Rijthoven, M. Balkenhol, K. Siliņa, J. van der Laak, and F. Ciompi, ‘HookNet: Multi-resolution convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation in histopathology whole-slide images’, Med. Image Anal., vol. 68, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101890.

Downloads

Published

24.03.2024

How to Cite

Putu Astri Novianti, Anak Agung Ngurah Frady Cakra Negara, Anak Agung Ngurah Bagaskara., A. A. N. G. . (2024). Transformed image features can improve machine learning performance for detecting benign-malignant of breast cancer. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(3), 2678–2688. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/5741

Issue

Section

Research Article