Comparative Analysis of Testing Approach in Context of Agile Software Development
Keywords:
ASD, SDLC, Testing Methods, Software DevelopmentAbstract
The Agile technique is becoming widely used by businesses worldwide to develop software products because it promises to provide high-quality products more quickly. Software testing is the most important way to evaluate a product's quality. Software testing in Agile development is still difficult and highly complex. This has mostly occurred as a result of Agile development's lack of emphasis on software testing activities. It emphasises frequent delivery, brief iterations, and client participation. This paper delves into a comparative analysis of testing approaches within the context of ASD. We explore traditional testing methodologies used in waterfall models and contrast them with techniques tailored for the iterative nature of agile projects. Key aspects like test automation, exploratory testing, and continuous integration will be discussed alongside their advantages and limitations in the agile environment. Finally, the paper concludes by outlining a potential framework for agile testing, integrating various techniques for optimal results.
Downloads
References
V. Szalvay, “An Introduction to Agile Software Development,” 2004.
A. Choday and C. Dwivedula, “A Systematic Literature Review and Industrial Evaluation of Incorporating Lean Methodologies in Software Engineering”.
K. Beck and C. Andres, Extreme programming explained: embrace change, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2005.
M. Cohn, Succeeding with agile: software development using Scrum. Pearson Education, 2010.
A. Cockburn, Agile software development: the cooperative game. Pearson Education, 2006.
R. C. Martin, Agile software development, principles, patterns, and practices, First edition, Pearson new international edition. Harlow: Pearson, 2014.
Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler,
M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., “Manifesto for Agile Software Development.,” 2001, [Online]. Available: https://agilemanifesto.org/
S. W. Ambler, Agile modeling: effective practices for eXtreme programming and the unified process. New York: J. Wiley, 2002.
J. D. Gould and C. Lewis, “Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think,” vol. 28, no. 3, 1985.
J. Whiteside, J. Bennett, and K. Holtzblatt, “Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution,” in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Elsevier, 1988, pp. 791–817. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-70536-5.50041-5.
O. Sohaib and K. Khan, “Integrating usability engineering and agile software development: A literature review,” in 2010 International Conference On Computer Design and Applications, Qinhuangdao, China: IEEE, Jun. 2010, pp. V2-32-V2-38. doi: 10.1109/ICCDA.2010.5540916.
K. Curcio, R. Santana, S. Reinehr, and A. Malucelli, “Usability in agile software development: A tertiary study,” Comput. Stand. Interfaces, vol. 64, pp. 61–77, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2018.12.003.
S. Roy and P. K. Pattnaik, “Some Popular Usability Evaluation Techniques for Websites,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications (FICTA) 2013, S. C. Satapathy, S. K. Udgata, and B. N. Biswal, Eds., in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 247. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 535–543. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02931-3_61.
M. Düchting, D. Zimmermann, and K. Nebe, “Incorporating User Centered Requirement Engineering into Agile Software Development,” in Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability, J. A. Jacko, Ed., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4550. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 58–67. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_7.
J. Nielsen, “The usability engineering life cycle,” Computer, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 12– 22, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1109/2.121503.
M.-L. Sánchez-Gordón and L. Moreno, “Toward an Integration of Web Accessibility into Testing Processes,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 27, pp. 281–291, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.031.
Y. B. Leau, W. K. Loo, W. Y. Tham, and S. F. Tan, “Software Development Life Cycle AGILE vs Traditional Approaches”.
De Vicente Mohino, Bermejo Higuera, Bermejo Higuera, and Sicilia Montalvo, “The Application of a New Secure Software Development Life Cycle (S-SDLC) with Agile Methodologies,” Electronics, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 1218, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3390/electronics8111218.
“The Stages of the Agile Software Development Life Cycle,” The Stages of the Agile Software Development Life Cycle. https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/agile-software-development-life-cycle
“Types of Usability Testing,” Types of Usability Testing. https://www.uxtweak.com/usability-testing/types/
G. Nahar and S. Bordia Jain, “Uncovering the Usability Test Methods for Human–Computer Interaction,” vol. 681, no. 1, p. 57, doi: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-1909-3_6.
J. M. Carroll and M. B. Rosson, “Paradox of the active user.,” in Interfacing thought: Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction., Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press, 1987, pp. 80–111.
N. Ghasemifard, M. Shamsi, and A. R. R. Kenari, “A New View at Usability Test Methods of Interfaces for Human Computer Interaction,” 2015.
E. Geisen and J. Romano Bergstrom, “Think Aloud and Verbal-Probing Techniques,” in Usability Testing for Survey Research, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 131–161. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803656-3.00006-3.
M. J. Van den Haak, M. D. T. de Jong, and P. J. Schellens, “Employing think-aloud protocols and constructive interaction to test the usability of online library catalogues: a methodological comparison,” Interact. Comput., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1153–1170, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2004.07.007.
E. Nichols, E. Olmsted-Hawala, T. Holland, and A. A. Riemer, “Usability Testing Online Questionnaires: Experiences at the U.S. Census Bureau,” in Advances in Questionnaire Design, Development, Evaluation and Testing, P. Beatty, D. Collins, L. Kaye, J. L. Padilla, G. Willis, and A. Wilmot, Eds., Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2019, pp. 315–348. doi: 10.1002/9781119263685.ch13.
R. Franz and B. B. Neves, “Usability Is Ageless: Conducting Usability Tests with Older Adults,” in Ageing and Digital Technology, B. B. Neves and F. Vetere, Eds., Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019, pp. 99–114. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3693-5_7.
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, United States of America and A. Banker, “Usability testing with children: History of best practices, comparison of methods and gaps in literature,” presented at the DRS2022: Bilbao, Jun. 2022. doi: 10.21606/drs.2022.646.
R. Kirkscey, “Development and Patient User Experience Evaluation of an mHealth Informational App for Osteoporosis,” 2021.
A. F. Rahmawati, T. Wahyuningrum, A. C. Wardhana, A. Septiari, and L. Afuan, “User Experience Evaluation Using Integration of Remote Usability Testing and Usability Evaluation Questionnaire Method,” presented at the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Computational Intelligence (CyberneticsCom), IEEE, 2022, pp. 40–45.
M. S. Khalid, T. A. B. Tretow-Fish, and A. Roark, “Usability Evaluation of Adaptive Learning System RhapsodeTM Learner,” presented at the Proceedings of International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Development: ICICTD 2022, Springer, 2023, pp. 71–82.
Bhawana Verma, S.K.A.. (2019). Design & Analysis of Cost Estimation for New Mobile-COCOMO Tool for Mobile Application. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 7(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v7i1.5222
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
