Role of Robotic Process Automation and Navigation System in Transport Sector
Keywords:
Robotic Process Automation, Tracking, Navigation, Transport, System, Global Positioning System(GPS). IntroductionAbstract
Robotic process automation in transportation can lead to a setting that allows for semi- or completely autonomous navigation. In semi-autonomous mode, the system accepts conventional motion instructions through voice activation or a standard joystick interface and provides robotic movements with obstacle and collision avoidance features. While the fully autonomous mode trials are highly encouraging, the sparsest or semi-automation navigation option is the sparsest or semi-automation navigation mode. Financial savings, higher quality, and better customer experience are just a few of the advantages of robotic process automation (RPA).RPA is a technical application that uses business logic and structured input to automate business tasks. Using RPA technology, a company may develop software, or a "robot," to record and understand applications for processing a transaction, modifying data, triggering responses, and integrating with other digital systems. Businesses may utilize RPA to automate mundane rules-based business procedures, freeing up business users’ time to focus on customer service or other higher-value duties. It is crucial to the advancement of public transport. However, the company is currently experiencing major difficulties. The primary goals of this research are to assess the operational and financial performance, as well as the function of robotic navigation systems in the transportation industry. This research uses both primary and secondary data. It contains interviews with different metrics for data analysis that include operational and financial characteristics such as fleet, collection, and passengers, among others. A navigation system is a two-way communication system, similar to a digital telephone, that connects with a central service center to ascertain the user’s actual location and navigational information. Ideally, a human-to-human information interface is provided. Some of the components can be stored at a remote and fixed base station due to the usage of a two-way communication system.
Downloads
References
Pallavi, Joshi, S., Singh, D., Kaur, M. & Lee, H.-N. Comprehensive review of orthogonal regression and its applications in different domains. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 29, 4027–4047 (2022).
Das, R., Joshi, S., Meneses, C. & Biswas, T. Advanced unified earthquake catalog for north east india. Appl. Sci. 13, 2812 (2023).
Pallavi, Joshi, S., Das, R. & Bairwa, A. K. Earthquake disaster database system in assessment and prediction of seismic hazard. S@MACRONACCENT@adhan@MACRONACCENT@a 48, 225 (2023).
Butz, A., Baus, J., Krüger, A. & Lohse, M. A hybrid indoor navigation system. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, 25–32 (2001).
El-Sheimy, N. & Li, Y. Indoor navigation: State of the art and future trends. Satell. Navig. 2, 1–23 (2021).
Ivanov, R. Indoor navigation system for visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing on International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 143–149 (2010).
Martinez-Sala, A. S., Losilla, F., Sánchez-Aarnoutse, J. C. & García-Haro, J. Design, implementation and evaluation of an indoor navigation system for visually impaired people. Sensors 15, 32168–32187 (2015).
Li, T. et al. Indoorwaze: A crowdsourcing-based context-aware indoor navigation system. IEEE Transactions on Wirel. Commun. 19, 5461–5472 (2020).
Huang, B.-C., Hsu, J., Chu, E. T.-H. & Wu, H.-M. Arbin: Augmented reality based indoor navigation system. Sensors 20, 5890 (2020).
La Delfa, G. C., Monteleone, S., Catania, V., De Paz, J. F. & Bajo, J. Performance analysis of visualmarkers for indoor navigation systems. Front. Inf. Technol. & Electron. Eng. 17, 730–740 (2016).
Fazio, M., Buzachis, A., Galletta, A., Celesti, A. & Villari, M. A proximity-based indoor navigation system tackling the covid-19 social distancing measures. In 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 1–6 (IEEE, 2020).
Giudice, N. A. et al. Use of an indoor navigation system by sighted and blind travelers: Performance similarities across visual status and age. ACM Transactions on Access. Comput. (TACCESS) 13, 1–27 (2020).
Chen, Y. et al. Submap-based indoor navigation system for the fetch robot. IEEE Access 8, 81479–81491 (2020).
Tadepalli, S. K., Ega, P. A. & Inugurthi, P. K. Indoor navigation using augmented reality. (2021).
Hashimoto, R. & Cohen, M. Outdoor navigation system by ar. In SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 102, 04002 (EDP Sciences, 2021).
He, J. & Zhao, H. A new smart safety navigation system for cycling based on audio technology. Saf. science 124, 104583 (2020).
Al Khatib, E. I., Jaradat, M. A. K. & Abdel-Hafez, M. F. Low-cost reduced navigation system for mobile robot in indoor/outdoor environments. IEEE Access 8, 25014–25026 (2020).
Lütjohann, D. S., Jung, N. & Bräse, S. Open source life science automation: Design of experiments and data acquisition via “dial-a-device”. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 144, 100–107 (2015).
Göde, B., Holzmüller-Laue, S. & Thurow, K. New approach of standard-based end-to-end process automation in the life science automation. Chemie Ingenieur Tech. 87, 518–536 (2015).
Chapman, T. Lab automation and robotics: Automation on the move. Nature 421, 661–663 (2003).
Sakaki, K. et al. Localized, macromolecular transport for thin, adherent, single cells via an automated, single cell electroporation biomanipulator. IEEE Transactions on Biomed. Eng. 60, 3113–3123 (2013).
Gecks, W. & Pedersen, S. T. Robotics-an efficient tool for laboratory automation. IEEE transactions on industry applications 28, 938–944 (1992).
Ahuja, S. & Tailor, R. Performance evaluation of robotic process automation on waiting lines of toll plazas. NVEO- NATURAL VOLATILES & ESSENTIAL OILS Journal| NVEO 10437–10442 (2021).
Miyata, N., Ota, J., Arai, T. & Asama, H. Cooperative transport by multiple mobile robots in unknown static environments associated with real-time task assignment. IEEE transactions on robotics automation 18, 769–780 (2002).
Montgomery, J. F., Fagg, A. H. & Bekey, G. A. The usc afv-i: A behavior-based entry in the 1994 international aerial robotics competition. IEEE Expert. 10, 16–22 (1995).
Mi, Z., Yang, Y. & Yang, J. Y. Restoring connectivity of mobile robotic sensor networks while avoiding obstacles. IEEE Sensors J. 15, 4640–4650 (2015).
RM, K. C. et al. Distributed formation planning and navigation framework for wheeled mobile robots. J. Appl. sciences
(2011).
Ohya, I., Kosaka, A. & Kak, A. Vision-based navigation by a mobile robot with obstacle avoidance using single-camera vision and ultrasonic sensing. IEEE transactions on robotics automation 14, 969–978 (1998).
Ma, S.-W. et al. Robust elevator door recognition using lrf and camera. J. Inst. Control. Robotics Syst. 18, 601–607 (2012).
Kang, J.-G., An, S.-Y., Choi, W.-S. & Oh, S.-Y. Recognition and path planning strategy for autonomous navigation in the elevator environment. Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst. 8, 808–821 (2010).
Mohanty, P. K. & Parhi, D. R. A new hybrid optimization algorithm for multiple mobile robots navigation based on the cs-anfis approach. Memetic Comput. 7, 255–273 (2015).
Agarwal, P. & Singh, A. Performance improvement of urban bus system: issues and solution. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2, 4759–4766 (2010).
Carvalho, M., Syguiy, T. et al. Efficiency and effectiveness analysis of public transport of brazilian cities. J. Transp. Lit. 9, 40–44 (2015).
Gruzauskas, V. & Ragavan, D. Robotic process automation for document processing: A case study of a logistics service provider. J. Manag. 36, 119–126 (2020).
Palop, J. J., Mucke, L. & Roberson, E. D. Quantifying biomarkers of cognitive dysfunction and neuronal network hyperex- citability in mouse models of alzheimer’s disease: depletion of calcium-dependent proteins and inhibitory hippocampal remodeling. In Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia, 245–262 (Springer, 2010).
Pareek, R. Robotic process automation in managing the performance of transport sector employees. In Application and Adoption of Robotic Process Automation for Smart Cities, 152–163 (IGI Global, 2023).
Agostinelli, S., Marrella, A. & Mecella, M. Towards intelligent robotic process automation for bpmers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.00804 (2020).
Baltrušaitis, T., Ahuja, C. & Morency, L.-P. Multimodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis machine intelligence 41, 423–443 (2018).
Ferreira, D., Rozanova, J., Dubba, K., Zhang, D. & Freitas, A. On the evaluation of intelligent process automation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.02639 (2020).
Gao, J., van Zelst, S. J., Lu, X. & van der Aalst, W. M. Automated robotic process automation: A self-learning approach. In OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems", 95–112 (Springer, 2019).
Manyika, J. et al. A future that works: automation, employment and productivity. 2017. Mckinsey Glob. Inst. (2018).
Chakraborti, T. et al. From robotic process automation to intelligent process automation. In International Conference on Business Process Management, 215–228 (Springer, 2020).
Ranu Pareek, D. R. Role of robotic process automation in managing transportation systems for smart cities. Tuijin Jishu/Journal Propuls. Technol. 44, 3024–3036 (2023).
Jan, S. T., Ishakian, V. & Muthusamy, V. Ai trust in business processes: the need for process-aware explanations. In
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, 13403–13404 (2020).
Pareek, R. & Tailor, R. Adoption strategies for robotic process automation in the transportation sector. Acad. Mark. Stud. J.
27 (2023).
Jimenez-Ramirez, A., Reijers, H. A., Barba, I. & Valle, C. D. A method to improve the early stages of the robotic process automation lifecycle. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 446–461 (Springer, 2019).
Khan, S., Tailor, R., Pareek, R., Gujrati, R. & Uygun, H. Application of robotic process automation in education sector. J. Inf. Optim. Sci. 43, 1815–1834 (2022).
Leno, V., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Maggi, F. M. & Polyvyanyy, A. Automated discovery of data transformations for robotic process automation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.01007 (2020).
vom Brocke, J. & Rosemann, M. Handbook on business process management 2 (2015).
Tailor, R., Pareek, R. & Khang, A. Robot process automation in blockchain. The data-driven blockchain ecosystem: fundamentals, applications, emerging technologies 149–164 (2022).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
