Community Engagement and Forest Conservation in Sri Lanka

Authors

  • S.H.S.M.Siriwardana

Keywords:

Community, ecosystems, deforestation, initiatives

Abstract

Community engagement is essential for the conservation and sustainable management of forest ecosystems, especially in countries such as Sri Lanka, where rural populations depend significantly on forest resources. This study examines the relationship between community involvement and forest conservation efforts, emphasizing successful projects and obstacles encountered in Sri Lanka.

In order to manage forests sustainably in the face of mounting demand from deforestation, increased agricultural production, and development initiatives, local communities must be involved. Realizing that locals are important stakeholders in forest conservation initiatives as well as its stewards, Sri Lanka has implemented a number of initiatives to encourage this involvement. Forest areas are given ownership or management rights to local communities. It is suggested for communities to preserve the ecosystem while making sustainable use of forest resources for their livelihoods. It is now well acknowledged that local people' contributions to forest management are preferable to the conventional command-based control strategy. But after a few years of implementation, the majority of initiatives collapsed because the community did not participate, leaving community forestry with an uncertain future. This study looks at the intention of Sri Lankans to participate in community forestry programs. The results also showed that there is still much to learn about the goals of the policy-making process and the community participation and forest conservation program. Therefore, in order to increase awareness, require quick attention. Furthermore, if locals are not encouraged to participate in this duty, government initiatives may be insufficient or ineffectual. In order to guarantee that community-based forest management policies are uniformly applied at all administrative levels across the nation, the Department of Forest Conservation should take sensible steps and rigorously assess their appropriateness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nagendra H, Karmacharya M, Karna B. Evaluating forest management in Nepal: views across space and time. Ecol. Soc. 2005; 10–24.

Maryudi A, Devkota PR, Schusser C, Yufanyi C, Salla M, Aurenhammer H, et al. Back to basics: considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. Forest Policy Economics. 2012, 14;1–15.

Baylis K, Honey-Rosés J, Börner J, Corbera E, Ezzine-de-Blas D, Ferraro PJ, et al. Mainstreaming Impact Evaluation in Nature Conservation. Conserv. Lett. 2016; 9: 58–64.

De Zoysa M. Community-based Forest management in Sri Lanka: Approaching a green economy and environment. Sri Lanka For. 2017; 38:1–23.

Dissanayake MWMWTB. Evaluation of the farmer’s Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium. Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka: Department of Forestry and Environmental Science, University of Sri Jayewardenepura; 2013.

Panabokke CR. Soils and agro-ecological environments of Sri Lanka. Colombo: NARESA; 1996.

Gunatilake HM. The role of rural development in protecting tropical rainforests: evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Environmental Management. 1998; 53(3):273–292.

Gunatilake HM. The role of rural development in protecting tropical rainforests: evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Environmental Management. 1998; 53(3):273–292.

Wing C, Simon K, Ricardo A, Gomez B1. Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research. Annual Review of Public Health. 2018; 453–469. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507

Fredriksson A, Oliveira GM. Impact evaluation using Difference-in-Differences. RAUSP Management Journal. 2019; 54: 519–532.

Rahut DB, Ali A, Behera B. Household participation and effects of community forest management on income and poverty levels: Empirical evidence from Bhutan. Forest Policy Economics. 2015; 61:20–29

Shrestha KK, McManus P. The politics of community participation in natural resource management: Lessons from community forestry in Nepal. Aust. For. 2008; 71:135–146.

Pandit R, Bevilacqua E. Social Heterogeneity and Community Forestry Processes: Reflections from Forest Users of Dhading District, Nepal. Small-scale Forestry. 2011. b; 10:97–113.

Rai R, Neupane P, Dhakal A. Is the contribution of community forest users financially efficient? A household level benefit-cost analysis of community forest management in Nepal. Int. J. Commons. 2016; 10:142–157.

Fisher R., Prabhu R., McDougall C. People, forests, and need for adaptation In: Fisher R, Prabhu R, McDougall C. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR); 2007. Pp1–16.

Jalilova G, Khadka C, Vacik H. Developing criteria and indicators for evaluating sustainable forest management: A case study in Kyrgyzstan. For. Policy Econ. 2012; 21:32–43.

D. N. Koralagama, M. Wijeratne and W. N. De Silva, “Emergence of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) Technique as a Strategy towards Sustainable Development: A Sri Lankan Experience”, Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics Volume 108, No. 2, 2007, pages 149–160.

Siriwardana S.H.S.M and Ven. Pinnawala Sangasumana, “The Impact of Anthropogenic Intervention on the Walauwewaththa Wathurana Fresh Water Swamp Forest in Sri Lanka”, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (IJMS) Volume 5, Issue 2, 2018.

Google. (2023). Sri Lanka [Map]. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/maps

Downloads

Published

12.06.2024

How to Cite

S.H.S.M.Siriwardana. (2024). Community Engagement and Forest Conservation in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(4), 4215–4223. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/7020

Issue

Section

Research Article