Cost Estimation Models for Sustainable Infrastructure Using Recycled Materials for Road Engineering

Authors

  • Mittal Chaudhari
  • Mayur Parmar
  • Harshit Sheladiya

Keywords:

Economic feasibility, Lifecycle cost analysis (LCCA), Pavement performance, Reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), Recycled concrete aggregates (RCA), Road engineering

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable road infrastructure has driven interest in recycled materials like reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled concrete aggregates (RCA), yet accurate cost estimation remains a barrier to their adoption. This study develops and validates lifecycle cost estimation models tailored to RAP and RCA in road engineering, addressing economic and performance considerations. Through a methodology combining literature review, industry surveys, and three case studies (urban RAP resurfacing, rural RCA base layer, suburban RAP-RCA rehabilitation), key cost components—material procurement, processing, transportation, labor, quality control, and indirect costs—were identified. The proposed model, built on lifecycle cost analysis principles, integrates regional factors and performance metrics, achieving cost prediction errors of 1.0–2.8%. Results show lifecycle savings of 14–17% ($28,000–$45,000/km) compared to conventional materials, with RAP and RCA pavements meeting performance standards (e.g., 5 mm rutting after 5 years). Transportation and material quality significantly influence costs, with rural projects facing higher logistics expenses. The study recommends regional material databases, enhanced processing infrastructure, and policy incentives to promote adoption. These findings provide engineers and policymakers with a practical tool to support sustainable infrastructure, aligning with global recycling targets and reducing environmental impacts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Batouli, M., & Mostafavi, A. (2016). A hybrid simulation framework for integrated management of infrastructure networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(8), 04016025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001125

Copeland, A. (2011). Reclaimed asphalt pavement in asphalt mixtures: State of the practice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2293(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.3141/2293-02

D’Angelo, J., Grzybowski, K., & Lewis, S. (2012). Asphalt binder and mixture modifications for improved performance. Asphalt Paving Technology, 81, 543–567.

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.

European Commission. (2014). Directive 2008/98/EC on waste and repealing certain directives. Official Journal of the European Union, L 312, 3–30.

Horvath, A. (2013). Life-cycle environmental and economic assessment of using recycled materials in highway construction. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(21), 12175–12183. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4023607

Huang, Y., Bird, R., & Heidrich, O. (2013). Development of a life cycle assessment tool for construction and maintenance of asphalt pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.040

Kumar, S., & Patil, C. (2014). Use of fly ash in road construction: A review. Geotechnical Engineering Journal, 35(2), 123–134.

Lee, J., Kim, Y., & Lee, S. (2012). Performance evaluation of asphalt mixtures containing steel slag aggregate. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24(6), 701–709. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000438

Meyer, M. (2012). Incorporating sustainability into transportation planning and decision making. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(5), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.005

Poon, C. S., & Chan, D. (2013). The use of recycled aggregate in concrete in Hong Kong. Cement and Concrete Composites, 35(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.005

Robinette, C., & Epps, J. (2011). Energy, emissions, and cost savings of asphalt rubber pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137(12), 887–894. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000294

Santos, J., Ferreira, A., & Flintsch, G. (2015). A life cycle assessment model for pavement management: Methodology and computational framework. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(6), 762–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.904796

Shi, X., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Zollinger, D. (2018). Sustainability assessment of recycled concrete aggregates in pavement construction. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.023

Tam, V. W. Y. (2013). Recycled aggregate from concrete waste for higher grades of concrete production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.004

Zaumanis, M., & Mallick, R. B. (2015). Review of very high-content reclaimed asphalt use in plant-produced pavements: State of the art. Construction and Building Materials, 76, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.053

Downloads

Published

25.06.2020

How to Cite

Mittal Chaudhari, Mayur Parmar, & Harshit Sheladiya. (2020). Cost Estimation Models for Sustainable Infrastructure Using Recycled Materials for Road Engineering. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 8(2), 121–129. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/7521

Issue

Section

Research Article