Multi-Layer Profiling Systems for Adaptive Machine Learning Training Optimization
Keywords:
GPU Utilization Profiling, Machine Learning Training Optimization, Energy-efficient Deep Learning, Performance Bottleneck Detection, Adaptive Resource SchedulingAbstract
Modern machine learning training infrastructure suffers from a critical efficiency gap: despite substantial investment in GPU accelerators, fleet-wide streaming multiprocessor utilization reaches merely 24.3%, representing three-quarters of theoretical compute capacity sitting idle. This article argues that this utilization crisis stems from insufficient observability rather than inherent computational constraints. We present a comprehensive analysis of multi-layer profiling systems designed as formal feedback control architectures spanning application, hardware, and infrastructure layers. Drawing on empirical studies across production GPU datacenters, we develop a taxonomy of performance bottlenecks encompassing computational underutilization, data pipeline stalls, and distributed communication overhead. We survey scheduling optimization strategies, precision-aware training techniques, timeline-based visualization tools, and automated recommendation systems that collectively enable 30–50% cost reduction and 40–60% energy savings relative to unoptimized baselines. The environmental implications are substantial: single large-model training runs consume carbon equivalent to 12–25 individuals' annual budgets. We conclude that adaptive self-tuning architectures achieving 90–95% of manually optimized performance represent a viable path toward efficient, sustainable, and democratized machine learning infrastructure
Downloads
References
David Patterson et al., “Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training,” arXiv:2104.10350, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.10350
Lukasz Wesolowski et al., “Datacenter-Scale Analysis and Optimization of GPU Machine Learning Workloads,” IEEE Xplore, 2021. https://web.stanford.edu/~cgregg/chris-gregg/pubs/Datacenter-Scale_Analysis_and_Optimization_of_GPU_Machine_Learning_Workloads.pdf
Ehsan Yousefzadeh-Asl-Miandoab et al., “Profiling & Monitoring Deep Learning Training Tasks,” ACM, 2023. https://itu-dasyalab.github.io/RAD/publication/papers/euromlsys2023.pdf
Matthias Langer et al., “Distributed Training of Deep Learning Models: A Taxonomic Perspective,” IEEE, 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.03970
Wei Gao et al., “Deep Learning Workload Scheduling in GPU Datacenters: Taxonomy, Challenges and Vision,” arXiv:2205.11913v3, 2022. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.11913
Dong-Ki Kang et al., “Cost Efficient GPU Cluster Management for Training and Inference of Deep Learning,” MDPI, 2022. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/474
Alexander Isenko et al., “Where Is My Training Bottleneck? Hidden Trade-Offs in Deep Learning Preprocessing Pipelines,” arXiv:2202.08679v3, 2022. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.08679
Farui Wang et al., “Dynamic GPU Energy Optimization for Machine Learning Training Workloads,” arXiv:2201.01684v1, 2022. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.01684
Lusine Abrahamyan et al., “Learned Gradient Compression for Distributed Deep Learning,” arXiv:2103.08870v2, 2021. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.08870
Shyam Deshmukh et al., “Collaborative Learning Based Straggler Prevention in Large-Scale Distributed Computing Framework,” Wiley, 2021. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2021/8340925
Marion Dörrich et al., “Impact of Mixed Precision Techniques on Training and Inference Efficiency of Deep Neural Networks,” ResearchGate, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371425836
Rupinder Kaur et al., “A Survey of Advancements in Scheduling Techniques for Efficient Deep Learning Computations on GPUs,” MDPI, 2025. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/14/5/1048
Lucía Bouza Heguerte et al., “How To Estimate Carbon Footprint When Training Deep Learning Models? A Guide And Review,” arXiv:2306.08323v2, 2023. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.08323
Syed Mhamudul Hasan et al., “Carbon Emission Quantification of Machine Learning: A Review,” IEEE, 2025. https://www.taminul.com/site/research/journal-papers/carbon-sustainibility-review.pdf
Myeongjae Jeon et al., “Analysis of Large-Scale Multi-Tenant GPU Clusters for DNN Training Workloads,” USENIX, 2019. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/atc19-jeon.pdf
Emma Strubell et al., “Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP,” Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. https://aclanthology.org/P19-1355.pdf
Meng Wang et al., “A Survey on Large-scale Machine Learning,” arXiv:2008.03911v1, 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.03911
Alexandre Lacoste et al., “Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learning,” arXiv:1910.09700v2, 2019. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.09700
Dipesh Gyawali, “Comparative Analysis of CPU and GPU Profiling for Deep Learning Models,” arXiv:2309.02521v3, 2023. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.02521
Qinghao Hu et al., “Characterization and Prediction of Deep Learning Workloads in Large-Scale GPU Datacenters,” ACM, 2021. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3458817.3476223
Bilge Acun et al., “Understanding Training Efficiency of Deep Learning Recommendation Models at Scale,” arXiv:2011.05497v1, 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.05497
Istvan Fehervari et al., “Unbiased Evaluation of Deep Metric Learning Algorithms,” arXiv:1911.12528v1, 2019. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.12528
Alexander Sergeev and Mike Del Balso, “Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in
TensorFlow,” arXiv:1802.05799v3, 2018. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.05799
Yanghua Peng et al., “Optimus: An Efficient Dynamic Resource Scheduler for Deep
Learning Clusters,” ACM, 2018. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3190508.3190517?accessTab=true
Wencong Xiao et al., “Gandiva: Introspective Cluster Scheduling for Deep Learning,” USENIX, 2018. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/osdi18-xiao.pdf
Bartłomiej Kocot et al., “Energy-Aware Scheduling for High-Performance Computing Systems: A Survey,” MDPI, 2023. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/890
Deepak Narayanan et al., “Heterogeneity-Aware Cluster Scheduling Policies for Deep Learning Workloads,” USENIX, 2020. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/osdi20-narayanan_deepak.pdf
Aurick Qiao et al., “Pollux: Co-adaptive Cluster Scheduling for Goodput-Optimized Deep Learning,” USENIX, 2021. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/osdi21-qiao.pdf
Yanjie Gao et al., “An Empirical Study on Low GPU Utilization of Deep Learning Jobs,” ACM, 2024. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3597503.3639232
Zhihao Jia et al., “TASO: Optimizing Deep Learning Computation with Automatic Generation of Graph Substitutions,” ACM, 2019. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3341301.3359630
Doris Xin et al., “Production Machine Learning Pipelines: Empirical Analysis and Optimization Opportunities,” ACM, 2021. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3448016.3457566
Jie Liu et al., “Large Scale Caching and Streaming of Training Data for Online Deep Learning,” ACM, 2022. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3526058.3535453
Lusine Abrahamyan et al., “Learned Gradient Compression for Distributed Deep Learning,” arXiv:2103.08870v2, 2021. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.08870
Aswathy Ravikumar and Harini Sriraman, “DPro-SM – A distributed framework for proactive straggler mitigation using LSTM,” ScienceDirect, 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023107754
Tianqi Chen et al., “TVM: End-to-End Optimization Stack for Deep Learning,” University of Washington Technical Report UW, 2017. Anso https://dada.cs.washington.edu/research/tr/2017/12/UW-CSE-17-12-01.pdf
Dipankar Das et al., “Mixed Precision Training Of Convolutional Neural Networks Using Integer Operations,” arXiv:1802.00930v2, 2018. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.00930
Amir Gholami et al., “A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference,” arXiv:2103.13630v3, 2021. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.13630
Hongzi Mao et al., “Resource Management with Deep Reinforcement Learning,” ACM, 2016. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3005745.3005750
Linnan Wang et al., “SuperNeurons: Dynamic GPU Memory Management for Training Deep Neural Networks,” ACM, 2018. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3178487.3178491
Kevin Hu et al., “VizML: A Machine Learning Approach to Visualization Recommendation,” ACM, 2019. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3290605.3300358
Caglar Aytekin et al., “Clustering and Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with l2 Normalized Deep Auto-Encoder Representations,” arXiv:1802.00187v1, 2018. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.00187
Beyza Ermis et al., “Learning to Rank in the Position Based Model with Bandit Feedback,” ACM, 2020. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3340531.3412723
Lianmin Zheng et al., “Ansor: Generating High-Performance Tensor Programs for Deep Learning,” USENIX, 2020. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/osdi20-zheng.pdf
Suyi Li et al., “Golgi: Performance-Aware, Resource-Efficient Function Scheduling for Serverless Computing,” ACM, 2023. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3620678.3624645
Nuha A. S. Alwan and Zahir M. Hussain, “Deep Learning Control for Digital Feedback Systems: Improved Performance with Robustness against Parameter Change,” MDPI, 2021. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/11/1245
Udit Gupta et al., “Chasing Carbon: The Elusive Environmental Footprint of Computing,” arXiv:2011.02839v1, 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.02839
Ana Paula Oliveira et al., “Beyond Efficiency: A Systematic Review of Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint Across the AI Lifecycle,” MDPI, 2026. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/3/1359
Peter Henderson et al., “Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learning,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2020. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume21/20-312/20-312.pdf
Lasse F. Wolff Anthony et al., “Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon Footprint of Training Deep Learning Models,” arXiv:2007.03051v1, 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.03051
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
