Predicting Prognosis in Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning and Imaging Data
Keywords:
Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Bayesian Networks (BNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Decision Trees (DTs)Abstract
Many distinct forms of cancer have contributed to cancer's label as a heterogeneous illness. In cancer research, an emphasis on early detection and prognosis of a cancer type is essential since it may improve clinical care of patients. Many research organizations in the biomedical and bioinformatics fields have studied the use of ML approaches for risk stratification of cancer patients because of its significance. Therefore, the goal of using these methods to simulate the development and management of malignant situations has been pursued. The capacity of ML algorithms to identify crucial elements in complicated datasets further highlights their significance. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Bayesian Networks (BNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), and Decision Trees (DTs) are only few of the methods that have been extensively used in cancer research to construct prediction models, leading to efficient and precise decision making. Although it is clear that ML approaches may enhance our knowledge of cancer development, they still need sufficient validation before they can be taken into account in routine clinical practice. In this paper, we summarize current ML methods used to simulate cancer development.
Downloads
References
Bashiri, A., Ghazisaeedi, M., Safdari, R., Shahmoradi, L., & Ehtesham, H. (2017). Improving the Prediction of Survival in Cancer Patients by Using Machine Learning Techniques: Experience of Gene Expression Data: A Narrative Review. Iranian journal of public health, 46(2), 165.
Maurya, R. K., Yadav, S. K., & Tewari, P. (2019, December). Epidemiology of Breast Cancer (BC) and Its Early Identification via Evolving Machine Learning Classification Tools (MLCT)–A Study. In International Conference on Biologically Inspired Techniques in Many-Criteria Decision Making (pp. 109-119). Springer, Cham.
Suryachandra, P., & Reddy, P. V. S. (2016, August). Comparison of machine learning algorithms for breast cancer. In 2016 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT) (Vol. 3, pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Mattiuzzi, C., & Lippi, G. (2020). Cancer statistics: a comparison between world health organization (WHO) and global burden of disease (GBD). European journal of public health, 30(5), 1026-1027
Balakumar, A., & Senthil, S. (2020). Machine Learning Is the Future for Lung Cancer Prognosis and Prediction. In Applications of Deep Learning and Big IoT on Personalized Healthcare Services (pp. 176-196). IGI Global.
Kurian, A. W., Bernhisel, R., Larson, K., Caswell-Jin, J. L., Shadyab, A. H., OchsBalcom, H., & Stefanick, M. L. (2020). Prevalence of Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Susceptibility Genes Among Women With Postmenopausal Breast Cancer. Jama, 323(10), 995-997.
Maes, F., Robben, D., Vandermeulen, D., & Suetens, P. (2019). The Role of Medical Image Computing and Machine Learning in Healthcare. In Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (pp. 9-23). Springer, Cham.
Maes, F., Robben, D., Vandermeulen, D., & Suetens, P. (2019). The Role of Medical Image Computing and Machine Learning in Healthcare. In Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (pp. 9-23). Springer, Cham.
Mangai, U. G., Samanta, S., Das, S., & Chowdhury, P. R.(2010). A survey of fusion and feature fusion strategies for pattern classification. IETE Technical Review,27(4).
Mani, S., Chen, Y., Li, X., Arlinghaus, L., Chakravarthy, A. B., Abramson, V.,& Yankeelov, T. E. (2013). Machine learning for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(4), 688-695.
Maroco, J., Silva, D., Rodrigues, A., Guerreiro, M., Santana, I., & de Mendonça, A. (2011). Data mining methods in the prediction of Dementia: A real-data comparison of the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, neural networks, support vector machines, classification trees and random forests. BMC research notes, 4(1), 1-14.
Mathur, M. R., Singh, A., Dhillon, P. K., Dey, S., Sullivan, R., Jain, K. K& Rajaraman, P. (2014). Strategies for cancer prevention in India—Catching the ‘low hanging fruits’. Journal of Cancer Policy, 2(4), 105-106
Mccarthy, J. F., Marx, K. A., Hoffman, P. E., Gee, A. G., O'neil, P., Ujwal, M. L., & Hotchkiss, J. (2004). Applications of machine learning and high‐ dimensional visualization in cancer detection, diagnosis, and management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1020(1), 239-262.
Mihaylov, I., Nisheva, M., & Vassilev, D. (2019). Application of Machine Learning Models for Survival Prognosis in Breast Cancer Studies. Information, 10(3), 93
Moslemi, A., Mahjub, H., Saidijam, M., Poorolajal, J., & Soltanian, A. R. (2016). Bayesian survival analysis of high-dimensional microarray data for mantle cell lymphoma patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 17(1), 95-100.
Ahire, P. G. ., & Patil, P. D. . (2023). Context-Aware Clustering and the Optimized Whale Optimization Algorithm: An Effective Predictive Model for the Smart Grid. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i1.5987
Paul, D., Su, R., Romain, M., Sébastien, V., Pierre, V., & Isabelle, G. (2017). Feature selection for outcome prediction in oesophageal cancer using genetic algorithm and random forest classifier. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 60, 42-49
Pearlman, R., Frankel, W. L., Swanson, B., Zhao, W., Yilmaz, A., Miller, K., ... & Goldberg, R. M. (2017). Prevalence and spectrum of germline cancer susceptibility gene mutations among patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. JAMA oncology, 3(4), 464- 471.
Priya, A. M., Kannammal, K. E., Kavya, S. P., Iswarya, R., & Nivetha, M. (2019). IDENTIFY BREAST CANCER USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM. Journal Homepage: http://www. ijesm. co. in, 8(4).
Sharma, A., Kulshrestha, S., & Daniel, S. (2017, December). Machine Learning approaches for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. In Soft Computing and its Engineering Applications (icSoftComp), 2017 International Conference on (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Prof. Sharayu Waghmare. (2012). Vedic Multiplier Implementation for High Speed Factorial Computation. International Journal of New Practices in Management and Engineering, 1(04), 01 - 06. Retrieved from http://ijnpme.org/index.php/IJNPME/article/view/8
Liu, S., Xu, C., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Yu, B., Liu, X., & Dehmer, M. (2018). Feature selection of gene expression data for cancer classification using double RBF-kernels. BMC bioinformatics, 19(1), 1-14
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
