Cross-Domain Analysis of ML and DL: Evaluating their Impact in Diverse Domains

Authors

  • Vinit Khetani Cybrix Technologies, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Yatin Gandhi Competent Software, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Saurabh Bhattacharya Research Scholar, Department of Computer Applications, National Institue of Technology, Raipur, India
  • Samir N. Ajani Department of Computer Engineering, St. Vincent Pallotti College of Engineering and Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
  • Suresh Limkar Department of Artificial Intelligence & Data Science, AISSMS Institute of Information Technology, Pune

Keywords:

potential, provides, opportunities, transferability, interconnected

Abstract

Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been widely used in recent years to develop new and innovative products and services in various industries. These techniques have the potential to transform the way people think about and use technology. They have the capability to perform complex tasks and make accurate predictions. The efficiency of DL and ML algorithms has been studied in various domains, leading to significant progress in several applications. As technology and the domains become more interconnected, it is important to explore their effects on different sectors. One of the most important factors that can be considered when it comes to analyzing the generalizability and transferability of these techniques is cross-domain analysis. This allows us to identify the potential of these techniques to solve various problems. Cross-domain analysis is beneficial for several reasons. It allows us to identify ML and DL algorithms' limitations and strengths and transfer knowledge between them, which can help speed up the development of new solutions and decrease the time and effort involved in the process. If ML algorithm is able to perform high-accuracy in healthcare, it can provide valuable insights for the detection of financial fraud. For several reasons, cross-domain analysis is essential for the design and implementation of DL and ML algorithms. It helps in identifying the specific requirements and challenges of the given domain, and it enables the optimization of existing frameworks. The objectives and characteristics of each domain dictate the need for specific modifications or upgrades. This study aims to analyze the effects of DL and ML algorithms on different sectors, such as healthcare, financial services, and network security. It will examine the suitability and performance of different ML and DL algorithms in these domains. The findings of this research will allow us to gain a deeper understanding of their potential to address specific applications. The study covers the effects of DL and ML algorithms on different sectors, such as healthcare, NLP, financial services, and network security. It performs a comprehensive analysis of the different algorithms in these areas, including Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). DL algorithms, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Transformer are also evaluated for their suitability and performance. This research offers actionable insights to practitioners and researchers, guiding them in picking suitable algorithms for specific applications, ultimately serving the goals of network security, healthcare, financial services, and NLP. The findings of this study will contribute to the increasing number of people who know about the applications of DL and DL algorithms. It will also help practitioners and researchers use these tools effectively in various fields. The study's cross-domain analysis also provides opportunities to enhance and transfer knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Park, C. H. Hong, D. Lee, K. Park, and H. Shin, “Prospective classification of Alzheimer’s disease conversion from mild cognitive impairment,” Neural Networks, vol. 164, pp. 335–344, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.04.018.

B. Wen, J. Zhou, P. Tang, X. Jia, W. Zhou, and J. Huang, “Current Progress in Artificial Intelligence-assisted Medical Image Analysis for Chronic Kidney Disease: A literature review,” J. Hazard. Mater., p. 130622, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.05.029.

A. Fertier, A. Montarnal, S. Truptil, and F. Bénaben, “Explainable prediction of loan default based on machine learning models,” Decis. Support Syst., no. January, p. 113260, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dsm.2023.04.003.

Y. Wu, Z. Fu, ·Xiaoxuan Liu, and ·Yuan Bing, “A hybrid stock market prediction model based on GNG and reinforcement learning,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 228, no. May, p. 120474, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120474.

G. X. Yuan, Y. Zhou, H. Liu, and C. Yan, “The Framework of CAFE Credit Risk Assessment for Financial Markets in China,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 202, pp. 33–46, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.04.006.

E. S. Sosinovich, D. M. Chubrick, B. M. Doubrov, and E. E. Zhuk, “Financial Events Risk Assessment Based on Historical Data Analysis,” J. Math. Sci. (United States), vol. 267, no. 2, pp. 222–227, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10958-022-06127-w.

Rana, P. ., Sharma, V. ., & Kumar Gupta, P. . (2023). Lung Disease Classification using Dense Alex Net Framework with Contrast Normalisation and Five-Fold Geometric Transformation. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i2.6133

L. Yue, W. Chen, X. Li, W. Zuo, and M. Yin, “A survey of sentiment analysis in social media,” Knowl. Inf. Syst., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 617–663, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10115-018-1236-4.

P. Savci and B. Das, “Comparison of pre-trained language models in terms of carbon emissions, time and accuracy in multi-label text classification using AutoML,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 5, p. e15670, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15670.

S. J, C. Gangadhar, R. K. Arora, P. N. Renjith, J. Bamini, and Y. devidas Chincholkar, “E-commerce customer churn prevention using machine learning-based business intelligence strategy,” Meas. Sensors, vol. 27, no. December 2022, p. 100728, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2023.100728.

H. Han, J. Zhang, J. Yang, Y. Shen, and Y. Zhang, “Generate domain-specific sentiment lexicon for review sentiment analysis,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 77, no. 16, pp. 21265–21280, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11042-017-5529-5.

M. M. Belal and D. M. Sundaram, “Comprehensive review on intelligent security defences in cloud: Taxonomy, security issues, ML/DL techniques, challenges and future trends,” J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 9102–9131, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.08.035.

F. O. Catak, M. Kuzlu, E. Catak, U. Cali, and D. Unal, “Security concerns on machine learning solutions for 6G networks in mmWave beam prediction,” Phys. Commun., vol. 52, p. 101626, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.phycom.2022.101626.

L. Caviglione, C. Comito, M. Guarascio, and G. Manco, “Emerging challenges and perspectives in Deep Learning model security: A brief survey,” Syst. Soft Comput., vol. 5, no. December 2022, p. 200050, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.sasc.2023.200050.

Y. Song, Y. Wang, X. Ye, R. Zaretzki, and C. Liu, “Loan default prediction using a credit rating-specific and multi-objective ensemble learning scheme,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 629, no. December 2021, pp. 599–617, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2023.02.014.

M. M. John, H. H. Olsson, and J. Bosch, “Developing ML/DL Models: A design framework,” Proc. - 2020 IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Softw. Syst. Process. ICSSP 2020, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3379177.3388892.

A. Mujumdar and V. Vaidehi, “Diabetes Prediction using Machine Learning Algorithms,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 165, pp. 292–299, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.01.047.

D. Sisodia and D. S. Sisodia, “Prediction of Diabetes using Classification Algorithms,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 132, no. Iccids, pp. 1578–1585, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.122.

M. A. Sarwar, N. Kamal, W. Hamid, and M. A. Shah, “Prediction of diabetes using machine learning algorithms in healthcare,” ICAC 2018 - 2018 24th IEEE Int. Conf. Autom. Comput. Improv. Product. through Autom. Comput., no. September, pp. 6–7, 2018, doi: 10.23919/IConAC.2018.8748992.

G. Swapna, R. Vinayakumar, and K. P. Soman, “Diabetes detection using deep learning algorithms,” ICT Express, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 243–246, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.icte.2018.10.005.

S. G. Alonso et al., “Data Mining Algorithms and Techniques in Mental Health: A Systematic Review,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 42, no. 9, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1018-2.

R. Chadha and S. Mayank, “Prediction of heart disease using data mining techniques,” CSI Trans. ICT, vol. 4, no. 2–4, pp. 193–198, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40012-016-0121-0.

S. Uddin, A. Khan, M. E. Hossain, and M. A. Moni, “Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction,” BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-1004-8.

M. M. Malik, S. Abdallah, and M. Ala’raj, “Data mining and predictive analytics applications for the delivery of healthcare services: a systematic literature review,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 270, no. 1–2, pp. 287–312, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2393-z.

C. Krittanawong, H. J. Zhang, Z. Wang, M. Aydar, and T. Kitai, “Artificial Intelligence in Precision Cardiovascular Medicine,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., vol. 69, no. 21, pp. 2657–2664, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.571.

S. Mohan, C. Thirumalai, and G. Srivastava, “Effective heart disease prediction using hybrid machine learning techniques,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 81542–81554, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923707.

Maria Gonzalez, Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection in Network Security , Machine Learning Applications Conference Proceedings, Vol 1 2021.

M. Habibpour et al., “Uncertainty-aware credit card fraud detection using deep learning,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 123, no. January, p. 106248, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106248.

[27] A. Cherif, A. Badhib, H. Ammar, S. Alshehri, M. Kalkatawi, and A. Imine, “Credit card fraud detection in the era of disruptive technologies: A systematic review,” J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 145–174, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.11.008.

X. Cheng et al., “Combating emerging financial risks in the big data era: A perspective review,” Fundam. Res., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 595–606, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.08.017.

R. Nyman, S. Kapadia, and D. Tuckett, “News and narratives in financial systems: Exploiting big data for systemic risk assessment,” J. Econ. Dyn. Control, vol. 127, p. 104119, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104119.

G. Du and F. Elston, “Financial risk assessment to improve the accuracy of financial prediction in the internet financial industry using data analytics models,” Oper. Manag. Res., vol. 15, no. 3–4, pp. 925–940, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12063-022-00293-5.

W. Wei and X. Zhao, “Fault text classification of on-board equipment in high-speed railway based on labeled-Doc2vec and BiGRU,” J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag., vol. 26, no. December 2022, p. 100372, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2023.100372.

L. N. Mintarya, J. N. M. Halim, C. Angie, S. Achmad, and A. Kurniawan, “Machine learning approaches in stock market prediction: A systematic literature review,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 216, pp. 96–102, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.115.

H. Zhang, J. Guo, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, and H. Zhao, “Judicial Nested Named Entity Recognition Method with MRC Framework,” Int. J. Cogn. Comput. Eng., vol. 4, no. 92, pp. 118–126, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcce.2023.03.002.

J. Cui, Z. Wang, S. B. Ho, and E. Cambria, Survey on sentiment analysis: evolution of research methods and topics, no. 0123456789. Springer Netherlands, 2023.

V. Gugueoth, S. Safavat, and S. Shetty, “Security of Internet of Things (IoT) using federated learning and deep learning — Recent advancements, issues and prospects,” ICT Express, no. xxxx, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.icte.2023.03.006.

S. KUMAR, “Alzheimer MRI Preprocessed Dataset | Kaggle.” [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/sachinkumar413/alzheimer-mri-dataset.

Μ. Μ. KAZANOVA, “Sentiment140 dataset with 1.6 million tweets.” .

Kaggle, “Credit Card Fraud Detection | Kaggle.” 2017, [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mlg-ulb/creditcardfraud.

M HASSAN ZAIB, “NSL-KDD | Kaggle.” [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/hassan06/nslkdd.

Proposed methodology

Downloads

Published

01.07.2023

How to Cite

Khetani, V. ., Gandhi, Y. ., Bhattacharya, S. ., Ajani, S. N. ., & Limkar, S. . (2023). Cross-Domain Analysis of ML and DL: Evaluating their Impact in Diverse Domains. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(7s), 253–262. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/2951

Most read articles by the same author(s)