Iot Techniques for Disaster Prediction and Prevention

Authors

  • Mustafa Hadi Abdullah Electric and computer engineering Altinbas University Istanbul, Turkey
  • Zaid Hamodat Electric and computer engineering Altinbas University Istanbul, Turkey

Keywords:

ML, DL, WSN, IOT

Abstract

Natural catastrophes such as landslides, floods, fires, and volcanic eruptions, as well as the damage produced by these events, are global issues that result in financial and human losses. This problem is exacerbated by changes in the planet's environmental conditions and is primarily evident in metropolitan areas. Because of pollution and a lack of planning, the deterioration of the ecosystem is more pronounced in these areas, damaging the ecology and influencing the local climate. As a result, this initiative makes three major contributions: (i) the use and evaluation of new IoT standards and emerging technologies in conjunction with WSN for the collection and distribution of data in natural environments, (ii) the use of the collected data for the prediction of natural disasters using Machine Learning (ML) techniques, with a case study on the characteristics of rivers and rainfall in Iraq and Turkey, and (iii) the proposal of an IoT-based and ML-based fault-tolerant architecture for the system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED); United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). Global trends and Perspectives Executive Summary. 2021. Available online: https://www.undrr.org/publication/2020-nonCOVID-year-disasters (accessed on 4 October 2021).

Altay, N.; Green, W.G. OR/MS research in disaster operations management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 175, 475–493. [CrossRef]

Sun, W.; Bocchini, P.; Davison, B.D. Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Disaster Management. Nat. Haz. 2020, 103, 2631–2689. [CrossRef]

Drakaki, M.; Tzionas, P. Investigating the impact of site management on distress in refugee sites using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 60, 102282. [CrossRef]

Drakaki, M.; Gören, H.G.; Tzionas, P. An intelligent multi-agent based decision support system for refugee settlement siting. Int. J. Disaster. Risk Reduct. 2018, 31, 576–588. [CrossRef]

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction; UNISDR: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. Available online: https://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_UNISDRTerminologyEnglish.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2021).

EM-DAT—The International Disasters Database. Guidelines. EM-DAT—Data Entry—Field Description/Definition. Available online: https://www.emdat.be/guidelines (accessed on 4 October 2021).

Van Wassenhove, L.N. Blackett memorial lecture humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2006, 57, 475–489. [CrossRef]

Arinta, R.R.; Andi, E.W.R. Natural disaster application on big data and machine learning: A review. In Proceedings of the 2019

th International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 20–21 November 2019; Volume 6, pp. 249–254. [CrossRef]

Yu, M.; Yang, C.; Li, Y. Big data in natural disaster management: A review. Geosciences 2018, 8, 165. [CrossRef]

Schmidhuber, J. Deep Learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Netw. 2015, 61, 85–117. [CrossRef]

Lecun, Y.; Bengio, Y.; Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 2015, 521, 436–444. [CrossRef]

Presa-Reyes, M.; Chen, S.C. Assessing Building Damage by Learning the Deep Feature Correspondence of before and after Aerial Images. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR), Shenzhen, China, 6–8 August 2020. [CrossRef]

Akshya, J.; Priyadarsini, P.L.K. A hybrid machine learning approach for classifying aerial images of flood-hit areas. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Data Science (ICCIDS), Chennai, India, 21–23 February 2019. [CrossRef]

Fan, C.; Wu, F.; Mostafavi, A. A Hybrid Machine Learning Pipeline for Automated Mapping of Events and Locations from Social Media in Disasters. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 10478–10490. [CrossRef]

Ben-Hur, A.; Horn, D.; Siegelmann, H.T.; Vapnik, V. A support vector clustering method. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000, Barcelona, Spain, 3–7 September 2000. [CrossRef]

Hofmann, T.; Schölkopf, B.; Smola, A.J. Kernel methods in machine learning. Ann. Statist. 2008, 36, 1171–1220. [CrossRef]

O’Connor, J.; Eberle, C.; Cotti, D.; Hagenlocher, M.; Hassel, J.; Janzen, S.; Narvaez, L.; Newsom, A.; Ortiz-Vargas, A.; Schuetze, S.; et al. Interconnected Disaster Risks. UNU-EHS 2021, 64. Available online: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/interconnecteddisaster-risks-20202021 (accessed on 4 October 2021).

Dwarakanath, L.; Kamsin, A.; Rasheed, R.A.; Anandhan, A.; Shuib, L. Automated Machine Learning Approaches for Emergency Response and Coordination via Social Media in the Aftermath of a Disaster: A Review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 68917–68931. [CrossRef]

Yuan, C.; Moayedi, H. Evaluation and comparison of the advanced metaheuristic and conventional machine learning methods for the prediction of landslide occurrence. Eng. Comput. 2020, 36, 1801–1811. [CrossRef]

Sankaranarayanan, S.; Prabhakar, M.; Satish, S.; Jain, P.; Ramprasad, A.; Krishnan, A. Flood prediction based on weather parameters using deep learning. J. Water Clim. Chang. 2019, 11, 1766–1783. [CrossRef]

Huang, Y.; Jin, L.; Zhao, H.S.; Huang, X.Y. Fuzzy neural network and LLE algorithm for forecasting precipitation in tropical cyclones: Comparisons with interpolation method by ECMWF and stepwise regression method. Nat. Hazards 2018, 91, 201–220. [CrossRef]

Asim, K.M.; Martínez-Álvarez, F.; Basit, A.; Iqbal, T. Earthquake magnitude prediction in Hindukush region using machine learning techniques. Nat. Hazards 2017, 85, 471–486. [CrossRef]

Amin, M.S.; Ahn, H. Earthquake disaster avoidance learning system using deep learning. Cogn. Syst. Res. 2021, 66, 221–235. [CrossRef]

Prasad, P.; Loveson, V.J.; Das, B.; Kotha, M. Novel ensemble machine learning models in flood susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int. 2021, 26, 1892209. [CrossRef]

Nsengiyumva, J.B.; Valentino, R. Predicting landslide susceptibility and risks using GIS-based machine learning simulations, case of upper Nyabarongo catchment. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2020, 11, 1250–1277. [CrossRef]

Shirzadi, A.; Bui, D.T.; Pham, B.T.; Solaimani, K.; Chapi, K.; Kavian, A.; Shahabi, H.; Revhaug, I. Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using a novel hybrid intelligence approach. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 60. [CrossRef]

Sriram, L.M.K.; Ulak, M.B.; Ozguven, E.E.; Arghandeh, R. Multi-Network Vulnerability Causal Model for Infrastructure CoResilience. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 35344–35358. [CrossRef]

Wahab, A.M.; Ludin, A.N.M. Flood vulnerability assessment using artificial neural networks in Muar Region, Johor Malaysia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 169, 012056. [CrossRef]

Mutlu, B.; Nefeslioglu, H.A.; Sezer, E.A.; Ali, A.M.; Gokceoglu, C. An experimental research on the use of recurrent neural networks in landslide susceptibility mapping. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 578. [CrossRef]

Shanthi, D. N. ., & J, S. . (2021). Machine Learning Architecture in Soft Sensor for Manufacturing Control and Monitoring System Based on Data Classification. Research Journal of Computer Systems and Engineering, 2(2), 01:05. Retrieved from https://technicaljournals.org/RJCSE/index.php/journal/article/view/24

Anupong, W., Yi-Chia, L., Jagdish, M., Kumar, R., Selvam, P. D., Saravanakumar, R., & Dhabliya, D. (2022). Hybrid distributed energy sources providing climate security to the agriculture environment and enhancing the yield. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52 doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102142

Downloads

Published

12.07.2023

How to Cite

Abdullah, M. H. ., & Hamodat, Z. . (2023). Iot Techniques for Disaster Prediction and Prevention. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(9s), 34–45. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/3092

Issue

Section

Research Article