Incremental Dynamic Analysis of Low and Medium Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings

Authors

  • Ambrish G., Chethan K.

Keywords:

Seismic risk, IDA, low and medium rise, PGA, floor acceleration.

Abstract

The probabilistic seismic risk analysis is an estimation of the damage probability and losses occurred due to the earthquake event. The evaluation of the buildings in the probabilistic terms is essential in the high seismic regions to check the performance due to the uncertainties of occurrence, type and intensity. In more recent times to ascertain more methodologically the performance of Structures, Incremental dynamic Analysis has emerged as a better choice. In the present paper a low and medium rise building is considered and analyzed by carrying out nonlinear time history analysis by scaling the PGA from 0.2g to 1.4g at an interval of 0.2g for the selected set of earthquake records.  The response of low and medium rise buildings with different support conditions for different damage measures are compared for maximum roof floor acceleration, Maximum Inter story drift ratio and maximum Isolator displacement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics”, 31(3), 491-514.

Vamvatsikos, D., & Fragiadakis, M. (2009). “Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty”. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38(7), 849-867, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.935.

Vamvatsikos, D. (2012). “Performing incremental dynamic analysis in parallel. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics”, 41(8), 1183-1198.

Bertero, V. V. (1977). “Strength and deformation capacities of buildings under extreme environments. Structural engineering and structural mechanics”, 53(1), 29-79.

Alanjari, P., Asgarian, B., Yahyai, M., Mirtaheri, M., & Rahmani Samani, H. (2017). “Incremental dynamic analysis of high‐rise towers. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings”, 26(18), e1447.

Bhandari, M. (2018).” Performance and Behavior of Base-Isolated Building Frames Subjected to Near and Far Field Earthquakes” (Doctoral dissertation, MNIT Jaipur).

CSI. (2016). Computer program ETABS. Computers and Structures, Inc.

T E Kelly “Base isolation of Structures - Design guidelines” Holmes Consulting Group Ltd (200 1).

N Torunbalci & G Ozpalanlar “Earthquake response analysis of mid-story buildings isolated with various seismic isolation techniques” The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China (2008)

Pacific earthquake engineering research centre (PEER) strong motion database. http://ngawest2002.berkeley.edu/

SeismoArtif. (2012). Earthquake engineering software solutions. Seismosoft Ltd.

BIS. (2016). Criteria for earthquake-resistant design of structures. IS1893 part 1 general provisions for buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards.

BIS. (2000). Plain and reinforced concrete-code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards.

BIS. (1987a). Design loads (other than earthquakes) for buildings and structures, imposed load. Bureau of Indian Standards.

BIS. (1987b). Unit weight of materials. Bureau of Indian Standards.

Ambrish, G., & Chethan, K. (2024). “Seismic Behaviour of RCC Framed Buildings with Different Structural Framing Types”. Tianjin Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue yu Gongcheng Jishu Ban)/Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology, 57(03), 18. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10792347

Gong, W., & Xiong, S. (2016). “Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of modified pseudo-negative stiffness control of a base-isolated building”. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(10), 1295-1309.

Downloads

Published

26.03.2024

How to Cite

Ambrish G. (2024). Incremental Dynamic Analysis of Low and Medium Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(21s), 4200 –. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/6248

Issue

Section

Research Article