Identification of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Modified Convolutional Neural Network (MCNN) and Feature Selection Techniques

Authors

  • S. Saravana Kumar Research Scholar, Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, India
  • K. Selvakumar Professor, Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, India
  • V. Senthil Murugan Department of Networking and communications, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of science and Technology, Kattankulathur, India

Keywords:

ASD dataset, Adaptive Grey Wolf Optimization (AGWO), Dragonfly Optimization, Modified Auto Encoder Convolutional Neural Network (M-AECNN) and SMOTE.

Abstract

ASDs (Autism Spectrum Disorders) are neurological disorders that impact people’s lifetime capacity to connect or interact with others. Autisms are behavioural diseases where symptoms often erupt in the first two years. The problems may bein at very early ages in patients of ASDs and extend into adolescence. The previous research developed a method called AGWO (Adaptive Grey Wolf Optimisation) to find the most important characteristics and effective classification methods in ASD datasets. However, because of the high training complexity of SVM (Support Vector Machines), this model employed a single classification-based prediction method, which is not appropriate for classifying big data sets. In order to effectively identify ASD, this study effort developed M-AECNN (Modified Auto Encoder Convolution Neural Networks) based classification and dimensionality reduction algorithms. In this work introduced a AGWO to identify the most significant attributes and efficient classification techniques in ASD datasets. Initially the SMOTE based pre-processing approach is applied for removing the irrelevant data in ASD dataset. Subsequently, The AGWO algorithm keeps going through this process until it finds the characteristic that has the lowest classification recall and accuracy. Finally, M-AECNN-based classification is used to determine if a dataset instance is ASD. The highest performing classifier for these binary datasets was identified by experimental examination of ASD datasets from toddlers, children, adolescents, and adults, taking into account recall, precision, F-measures, and classification errors. The dragonfly optimisation is introduced in this paper for optimising the overfitting in AECNN to increase performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Raj, S., & Masood, S. (2020). Analysis and detection of autism spectrum disorder using machine learning techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 167, 994-1004.

McCarty, P., & Frye, R. E. (2020, October). Early detection and diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: Why is it so difficult?. In Seminars in Pediatric Neurology (Vol. 35, p. 100831). WB Saunders.

Daniels, A. M., Halladay, A. K., Shih, A., Elder, L. M., & Dawson, G. (2014). Approaches to enhancing the early detection of autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(2), 141-152.

Robins, D. L., & Dumont-Mathieu, T. M. (2006). Early screening for autism spectrum disorders: update on the modified checklist for autism in toddlers and other measures. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 27(2), S111-S119.

Nadel, S., & Poss, J. E. (2007). Early detection of autism spectrum disorders: screening between 12 and 24 months of age. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 19(8), 408-417.

Pinto-Martin, J. A., Young, L. M., Mandell, D. S., Poghosyan, L., Giarelli, E., & Levy, S. E. (2008). Screening strategies for autism spectrum disorders in pediatric primary care. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 29(5), 345-350.

Nygren, G., Sandberg, E., Gillstedt, F., Ekeroth, G., Arvidsson, T., & Gillberg, C. (2012). A new screening programme for autism in a general population of Swedish toddlers. Research in developmental disabilities, 33(4), 1200-1210.

Toh, T. H., Tan, V. W. Y., Lau, P. S. T., & Kiyu, A. (2018). Accuracy of Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) in detecting autism and other developmental disorders in community clinics. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 48(1), 28-35.

Chlebowski, C., Robins, D. L., Barton, M. L., & Fein, D. (2013). Large-scale use of the modified checklist for autism in low-risk toddlers. Pediatrics, 131(4), e1121-e1127.

Robins, D. L. (2008). Screening for autism spectrum disorders in primary care settings. Autism, 12(5), 537-556.

Factor, R. S., Arriaga, R. I., Morrier, M. J., Mathys, J. B., Dirienzo, M., Miller, C. A., ... & Ousley, O. Y. (2022). Development of an interactive tool of early social responsiveness to track autism risk in infants and toddlers. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 64(3), 323-330.

Sherkatghanad, Z., Akhondzadeh, M., Salari, S., Zomorodi-Moghadam, M., Abdar, M., Acharya, U. R., ... & Salari, V. (2020). Automated detection of autism spectrum disorder using a convolutional neural network. Frontiers in neuroscience, 13, 1325.

Oosterling, I. J., Wensing, M., Swinkels, S. H., Van Der Gaag, R. J., Visser, J. C., Woudenberg, T., ... & Buitelaar, J. K. (2010). Advancing early detection of autism spectrum disorder by applying an integrated two‐stage screening approach. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(3), 250-258.

Khowaja, M., Robins, D. L., & Adamson, L. B. (2018). Utilizing two-tiered screening for early detection of autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 22(7), 881-890.

Guo, X., Dominick, K. C., Minai, A. A., Li, H., Erickson, C. A., & Lu, L. J. (2017). Diagnosing autism spectrum disorder from brain resting-state functional connectivity patterns using a deep neural network with a novel feature selection method. Frontiers in neuroscience, 11, 460.

Abdolzadegan, D., Moattar, M. H., & Ghoshuni, M. (2020). A robust method for early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder from EEG signals based on feature selection and DBSCAN method. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 40(1), 482-493.

Kosmicki, J. A., Sochat, V., Duda, M., & Wall, D. P. (2015). Searching for a minimal set of behaviors for autism detection through feature selection-based machine learning. Translational psychiatry, 5(2), e514-e514.

Alzubi, R., Ramzan, N., & Alzoubi, H. (2017, August). Hybrid feature selection method for autism spectrum disorder SNPs. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

Hossain, M. D., Kabir, M. A., Anwar, A., & Islam, M. Z. (2021). Detecting autism spectrum disorder using machine learning techniques. Health Information Science and Systems, 9(1), 1-13.

Liu, W., Yu, X., Raj, B., Yi, L., Zou, X., & Li, M. (2015, September). Efficient autism spectrum disorder prediction with eye movement: A machine learning framework. In 2015 International conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII) (pp. 649-655). IEEE.

Küpper, C., Stroth, S., Wolff, N., Hauck, F., Kliewer, N., Schad-Hansjosten, T., ... & Roepke, S. (2020). Identifying predictive features of autism spectrum disorders in a clinical sample of adolescents and adults using machine learning. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1-11.

Duda, M., Kosmicki, J. A., & Wall, D. P. (2014). Testing the accuracy of an observation-based classifier for rapid detection of autism risk. Translational psychiatry, 4(8), e424-e424.

Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research, 16, 321-357.

Han, H., Wang, W. Y., & Mao, B. H. (2005, August). Borderline-SMOTE: a new over-sampling method in imbalanced data sets learning. In International conference on intelligent computing (pp. 878-887). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in engineering software, 69, 46-61.

Al-Tashi, Q., Md Rais, H., Abdulkadir, S. J., Mirjalili, S., & Alhussian, H. (2020). A review of grey wolf optimizer-based feature selection methods for classification. Evolutionary machine learning techniques, 273-286.

Masci, J., Meier, U., Cireşan, D., & Schmidhuber, J. (2011, June). Stacked convolutional auto-encoders for hierarchical feature extraction. In International conference on artificial neural networks (pp. 52-59). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Sairam, K., Naren, J., Vithya, G., & Srivathsan, S. (2019). Computer aided system for autism spectrum disorder using deep learning methods. Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil, 23(01).

Mafarja, M., Heidari, A. A., Faris, H., Mirjalili, S., & Aljarah, I. (2020). Dragonfly algorithm: theory, literature review, and application in feature selection. Nature-inspired optimizers, 47-67.

Rahman, C. M., & Rashid, T. A. (2019). Dragonfly algorithm and its applications in applied science survey. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2019.

Kumar, D. ., & Sonia, S. (2023). Resources Efficient Dynamic Clustering Algorithm for Flying Ad-Hoc Network. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(2s), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i2s.6034

Juan Lopez, Machine Learning-based Recommender Systems for E-commerce , Machine Learning Applications Conference Proceedings, Vol 2 2022.

Pandey, J.K., Ahamad, S., Veeraiah, V., Adil, N., Dhabliya, D., Koujalagi, A., Gupta, A. Impact of call drop ratio over 5G network (2023) Innovative Smart Materials Used in Wireless Communication Technology, pp. 201-224.

Downloads

Published

26.10.2023

How to Cite

Kumar, S. S. ., Selvakumar, K. ., & Murugan, V. S. . (2023). Identification of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Modified Convolutional Neural Network (MCNN) and Feature Selection Techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(2s), 678–691. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/3690

Issue

Section

Research Article