Revolutionizing Healthcare IT: Addressing Legacy Systems with Enterprise Architecture
Keywords:
regulatory compliance, technical debt, legacy systems, data governance, healthcare, system integration, enterprise architecture, IT modernization, interoperability, securityAbstract
Technology obsolescence, integration issues, security risks, and rising costs plague healthcare legacy systems. Hospitals struggle with interoperability, data-driven insights, and regulatory compliance with these outdated technology. These issues require thought. Enterprise Architecture (EA) examines, plans, and monitors legacy system improvements to help healthcare organizations align IT systems with business goals, use resources, and assure scalability, security, and performance. Studies demonstrate EA's seamless integration, interoperability, and regulatory compliance may simplify older healthcare systems.
Legacy healthcare systems perform clinical, administrative, and operational duties. Legacy systems hinder healthcare innovation with AI, cloud, and big data. Many obsolete systems delay operations, create data silos, and inhibit healthcare organizations from adopting contemporary IT. Many suppliers no longer support obsolete technologies, making them expensive and resource-intensive to maintain and support, increasing security concerns and system failures. Outdated systems undermine healthcare data quality, availability, and security. Enterprise Architecture transforms IT into scalable, adaptive platforms.
Data management, apps, platforms, and procedures comprise healthcare IT enterprise architecture. It helps healthcare leaders streamline, standardize, and update processes. EA combines technologies and eliminates system technical debt to prevent business disruptions. TOGAF evaluates healthcare technologies and operations. EA suggests interoperability, data transmission, regulatory compliance, and cybersecurity for healthcare adaptation.
New and old healthcare systems must communicate. Standardizing system and platform data interchange formats, protocols, and channels unifies IT. Interoperability is crucial in healthcare because data quality and speed affect patient outcomes. Enterprise architecture frameworks manage operations and retire outmoded portions using old and new technology. Hospitals may use this strategy if important processes prevent system upgrades.
Historical healthcare systems may be harmful. When cybersecurity was easy, numerous legacy systems existed. Few systems safeguard healthcare data. Legacy system data breaches can threaten patient privacy and cost healthcare businesses money and legal difficulties. Enterprise Architecture solves these issues by integrating IT strategy with security best practices. EA helps hospitals preserve old systems while upgrading to encryption, access restrictions, and network segmentation.
EAs oversee outmoded procedures. Healthcare firms must protect patient data under HIPAA and GDPR. Compliance issues arise from legacy data management methods failing regulatory requirements. Enterprise data governance architecture helps companies lawfully handle patient data. Audit records, reporting, and compliance monitoring help EA avoid penalties. Legacy system maintenance costs are another Enterprise Architecture benefit. System age increases software, hardware, and staff training expenses. Vendor support issues force healthcare firms to use custom solutions or patchwork to run aging systems. Enterprise Architecture cuts IT costs and replaces expensive solutions. EA supports healthcare firms' IT expenses and digital competitiveness via cloud, virtualization, and open-source technologies.
Downloads
References
Ahsan, K., Shah, H., & Kingston, P. (2010). Healthcare modelling through enterprise architecture: A hospital case. In 2010 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (pp. 460-465). IEEE.
Bradley, R. V., Pratt, R. M., Byrd, T. A., & Simmons, L. L. (2011). The role of enterprise architecture in the quest for IT value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(2), 73-80.
Bui, Q. (2012). Making connections: A typological theory on enterprise architecture features and organizational outcomes. In AMCIS 2012 Proceedings (p. 14).
Bygstad, B., & Hanseth, O. (2016). Governing e-Health infrastructures: Dealing with tensions. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems.
Gebre-Mariam, M., & Fruijtier, E. (2017). Countering the "dam effect": The case for architecture and governance in developing country health information systems. Information Technology for Development, 24(2), 333-358.
Hjort-Madsen, K. (2012). Enterprise architecture implementation and management: A case study on interoperability. In 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4180-4189). IEEE.
Kaushik, A., & Raman, A. (2015). The new data-driven enterprise architecture for e-healthcare: Lessons from the Indian public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 63-74.
Kellermann, A. L., & Jones, S. S. (2013). What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health Affairs, 32(1), 63-68.
Rouhani, B. D., Mahrin, M. N., Nikpay, F., Ahmad, R. B., & Nikfard, P. (2015). A systematic literature review on enterprise architecture implementation methodologies. Information and Software Technology, 62, 1-20.
Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011). How does enterprise architecture add value to organisations? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(1), 141-168.
Winter, R., & Fischer, R. (2010). Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. In 2010 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
Zarvić, N., & Wieringa, R. (2014). An integrated enterprise architecture framework for business-IT alignment. Designing Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: Integrating Business Processes with IT Infrastructure, 63, 63-80
Aier, S., Gleichauf, B., & Winter, R. (2011). Understanding enterprise architecture management design - an empirical analysis. In Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings 2011 (p. 50).
Boonstra, A., Versluis, A., & Vos, J. F. (2014). Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 370.
Haux, R. (2010). Medical informatics: Past, present, future. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(9), 599-610.
Kohli, R., & Tan, S. S. L. (2016). Electronic health records: how can IS researchers contribute to transforming healthcare? MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 553-573.
Vessey, I., & Ward, K. (2013). The dynamics of sustainable IS alignment: The case for IS adaptivity. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(6), 283-311.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
IJISAE open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
