Assumption Inertia: The Hidden Accounting Risk in Utility Transition

Authors

  • Devyani Bajaj

Keywords:

accounting, reassessment, triggers, reaffirmed

Abstract

A recent United States Federal Energy policy has stressed that high energy costs “devastate American consumers” by increasing the cost of “heating, utilities, farming, and manufacturing.” [1] At a time when national policy rhetoric increasingly focuses on how energy costs affect households and industrial competitiveness, regulated utilities still lack a formal, repeatable mechanism to translate real-world asset performance, evolving economic conditions, and emerging policy trajectories back into core accounting assumptions. As a result, accounting treatments increasingly reflect historical expectations rather than current operational and regulatory reality. Key assumptions, particularly useful life, recoverability, and depreciation structure, become effectively frozen once established. They persist even as the conditions they were meant to represent change materially. Over time, this assumption inertia erodes the informational value of financial statements and concentrates risk rather than managing it. This structural lag becomes particularly acute in a transition environment. Asset utilization, policy direction, and economic usefulness can diverge significantly from accounting representations long before formal triggers force adjustment, resulting in deferred recognition and, ultimately, abrupt financial impacts. While advances in AI and analytics have largely eliminated historical data constraints and enabled far more forward-looking insight into asset performance and value, these signals remain largely excluded from accounting judgment due to governance gaps.This paper proposes a Performance-Informed Accounting Feedback Loop; a governed process through which accounting assumptions are periodically revalidated, or explicitly reaffirmed, using observable operational, financial, and policy signals. The objective is not continuous remeasurement, but disciplined reassessment, transforming accounting from a passive recorder of outcomes into a more forward-looking risk management tool.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

The White House. (2025, April 8). Strengthening the reliability and security of the United States electric grid. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-the-reliability-and-security-of-the-united-states-electric-grid/

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). (2025). Uniform System of Accounts Prescribed for Public Utilities and Licensees Subject to the Provisions of the Federal Power Act (18 CFR Part 101). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-18/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-101

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2021). IAS 16: Property, Plant and Equipment. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-16-property-plant-and-equipment/

Carbon Tracker Initiative. (2023). How stranded assets are reshaping energy investment decisions. https://carbontracker.org

Institute of Asset Management (IAM). (2024). Asset Management Landscape. https://theiam.org/knowledge/asset-management-landscape/

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (n.d.). ASC 410-20: Asset Retirement Obligations. https://asc.fasb.org

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2017). Enterprise Risk Management: Integrating with Strategy and Performance. https://www.coso.org

Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). (2020). The Three Lines Model. https://www.theiia.org/en/content/articles/global/the-iias-three-lines-model-an-update-of-the-three-lines-of-defense/

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/conceptual-framework/

Downloads

Published

28.07.2026

How to Cite

Devyani Bajaj. (2026). Assumption Inertia: The Hidden Accounting Risk in Utility Transition. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 14(1s), 2198–2203. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8503

Issue

Section

Research Article