Mitigation Priority Scale with Self-Organising Map in Viewing Flood Prone Area Distribution Pattern Mapping

Authors

  • Wahyu Fuadi, Ilham Sahputra, Dedi Fariadi, Hafizh Raihan

Keywords:

Analytic Hierarchy Process, Cluster, Flooding, Mitigation, Self-Organizing Map.

Abstract

Flooding is a prevalent natural calamity that causes detrimental effects. From 2019 to 2022, nearly all sub-districts spanning an area of 193,200 hectares experienced floods in the North Aceh region. Issues arising from insufficient information, particularly spatial data pertaining to the state of flood-prone areas and the subsequent damages that may be caused, which are crucial for guiding flood prevention measures. This study employed a Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and self-organizing map (SOM) models to categorize areas based on the distribution patterns of flood-prone areas. The main objective was to assess the level of risk associated with flood disasters. The research approach involves collecting data at the office of the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) in flood-prone areas, followed by establishing the causes of flooding based on criteria such as Soil Structure, Soil Slope, and Land Use. The subsequent phase entails classification utilizing the self-organizing map (SOM) architectural model. District Lhoksukon has the following values: X1 = 1, X2 = 0.005865103, X3 = 0.274919614, X4 = 0.468069147. The value of W1 is 0.468069147. Cluster 1 consists of 21 sub-districts, cluster 2 consists of 3 sub-districts, and cluster 3 consists of 3 sub-districts.  Cluster 3 exhibits moderate results and has a low susceptibility to flood distribution. Cluster 2 shows moderate susceptibility to flood distribution, whereas cluster 1 is highly susceptible to flood distribution. Essentially, the determination of mitigation priorities can be made by just examining the cluster pattern generated. Cluster 2 should be given the highest priority, followed by cluster 3, and lastly cluster 3.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. H. Pour, A. K. A. Wahab, S. Shahid, M. Asaduzzaman, and A. Dewan, “Low impact development techniques to mitigate the impacts of climate-change-induced urban floods: Current trends, issues and challenges,” Sustain Cities Soc, vol. 62, p. 102373, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.SCS.2020.102373.

S. W. Lubis and M. R. Respati, “Impacts of convectively coupled equatorial waves on rainfall extremes in Java, Indonesia,” International Journal of Climatology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 2418–2440, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1002/JOC.6967.

R. Chandra Wijaya, “Digital Analysis Method for Predicting Flood in A River of Lhoksukon Aceh North Indonesia,” Jurnal Teknik Pengairan: Journal of Water Resources Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 171–177, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.21776/UB.PENGAIRAN.2023.014.02.8.

C. Zhang, C. Fan, W. Yao, X. Hu, and A. Mostafavi, “Social media for intelligent public information and warning in disasters: An interdisciplinary review,” Int J Inf Manage, vol. 49, pp. 190–207, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2019.04.004.

F. Klijn, M. Marchand, K. Meijer, H. van der Most, and D. Stuparu, “Tailored flood risk management: Accounting for socio-economic and cultural differences when designing strategies,” Water Secur, vol. 12, p. 100084, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.WASEC.2021.100084.

H. A. W. Irsyad and N. Hitoshi, “Flood disaster evacuation route choice in Indonesian urban riverbank kampong: Exploring the role of individual characteristics, path risk elements, and path network configuration,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 81, p. 103275, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2022.103275.

M. I. Zakaria, W. A. Jabbar, and N. Sulaiman, “Development of a smart sensing unit for LoRaWAN-based IoT flood monitoring and warning system in catchment areas,” Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, vol. 3, pp. 249–261, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.IOTCPS.2023.04.005.

C. Chen, J. Jiang, Y. Zhou, N. Lv, X. Liang, and S. Wan, “An edge intelligence empowered flooding process prediction using Internet of things in smart city,” J Parallel Distrib Comput, vol. 165, pp. 66–78, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JPDC.2022.03.010.

C. D. Girotto et al., “A critical review of digital technology innovations for early warning of water-related disease outbreaks associated with climatic hazards,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 100, p. 104151, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2023.104151.

Y. He, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, and C. Liao, “Enhancement of Urban Floodwater Mapping From Aerial Imagery With Dense Shadows via Semisupervised Learning,” IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, vol. 15, pp. 9086–9101, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3215730.

M. Sakkari and M. Zaied, “A Convolutional Deep Self-Organizing Map Feature extraction for machine learning,” Multimed Tools Appl, vol. 79, no. 27–28, pp. 19451–19470, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1007/S11042-020-08822-9/METRICS.

E. Karamidehkordi, V. Karimi, Z. Hallaj, M. Karimi, and L. Naderi, “Adaptable leadership for arid/semi-arid wetlands conservation under climate change: Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach,” J Environ Manage, vol. 351, p. 119860, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2023.119860.

Z. Wu, W. Xue, H. Xu, D. Yan, H. Wang, and W. Qi, “Urban Flood Risk Assessment in Zhengzhou, China, Based on a D-Number-Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process and a Self-Organizing Map Algorithm,” Remote Sensing 2022, Vol. 14, Page 4777, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 4777, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/RS14194777.

O. Avcı and O. Abdeljaber, “Self-Organizing Maps for Structural Damage Detection: A Novel Unsupervised Vibration-Based Algorithm,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 30, no. 3, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000801.

M. Avand, H. Moradi, and M. R. lasboyee, “Spatial modeling of flood probability using geo-environmental variables and machine learning models, case study: Tajan watershed, Iran,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 3169–3186, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.ASR.2021.02.011.

Z. Wu, W. Xue, H. Xu, D. Yan, H. Wang, and W. Qi, “Urban Flood Risk Assessment in Zhengzhou, China, Based on a D-Number-Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process and a Self-Organizing Map Algorithm,” Remote Sensing 2022, Vol. 14, Page 4777, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 4777, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/RS14194777.

J. H. Wang, G. F. Lin, Y. R. Huang, I. H. Huang, and C. L. Chen, “Application of hybrid machine learning model for flood hazard zoning assessments,” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 395–412, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/S00477-022-02301-3/METRICS.

Q. Van Doan, H. Kusaka, T. Sato, and F. Chen, “S-SOM v1.0: A structural self-organizing map algorithm for weather typing,” Geosci Model Dev, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 2097–2111, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.5194/GMD-14-2097-2021.

Q. Van Doan, H. Kusaka, T. Sato, and F. Chen, “S-SOM v1.0: a structural self-organizing map algorithm for weather typing,” Geosci Model Dev, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 2097–2111, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.5194/GMD-14-2097-2021.

T. Kohonen, “Self-Organizing Maps,” vol. 30, 2001, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2.

Ishizaka and S. Siraj, “Interactive consistency correction in the analytic hierarchy process to preserve ranks,” Decisions in Economics and Finance, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 443–464, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/S10203-020-00309-4/METRICS.

Downloads

Published

12.06.2024

How to Cite

Wahyu Fuadi. (2024). Mitigation Priority Scale with Self-Organising Map in Viewing Flood Prone Area Distribution Pattern Mapping. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(4), 2323 –. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/6618

Issue

Section

Research Article